PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHYG vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHYG vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (SHYG) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHYG achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 12.13% return. Over the past 10 years, SHYG has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 5.18%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.85% annualized return.


SHYG

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.44%
6M
1.95%
1Y
6.50%
3Y*
8.12%
5Y*
4.83%
10Y*
5.18%

ACWI

1D
-0.83%
1M
5.28%
YTD
12.13%
6M
12.96%
1Y
29.18%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
12.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHYG vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHYG
iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.44%7.94%8.17%10.38%-4.71%4.60%3.15%9.93%0.02%5.11%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
12.13%22.41%17.45%22.27%-18.39%18.66%16.34%26.59%-9.19%24.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SHYG and ACWI is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2013

0.71

The correlation between SHYG and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

SHYG vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SHYG
ACWI

Utilities

99.3%
2.6%

Real Estate

0.7%
1.8%

Basic Materials

-

3.7%

Communication Services

-

9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.0%

Energy

-

4.2%

Financial Services

-

16.1%

Healthcare

-

8.1%

Industrials

-

10.9%

Technology

-

29.4%

Utilities

SHYG
99.3%
ACWI
2.6%

Real Estate

SHYG
0.7%
ACWI
1.8%

Basic Materials

SHYG

-

ACWI
3.7%

Communication Services

SHYG

-

ACWI
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SHYG

-

ACWI
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

SHYG

-

ACWI
5.0%

Energy

SHYG

-

ACWI
4.2%

Financial Services

SHYG

-

ACWI
16.1%

Healthcare

SHYG

-

ACWI
8.1%

Industrials

SHYG

-

ACWI
10.9%

Technology

SHYG

-

ACWI
29.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHYG vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHYG
SHYG Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SHYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYG Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYG Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHYG vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (SHYG) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHYGACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.41

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.73

3.01

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.23

13.53

+2.71

SHYG vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHYG Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHYG and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHYGACWIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

2.29

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.71

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.75

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.43

+0.30

Drawdowns

SHYG vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHYG drawdown since its inception was -19.26%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHYG and ACWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHYGACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.26%

-56.00%

+36.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.75%

-9.73%

+7.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.53%

-16.55%

+12.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.39%

-26.42%

+17.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.26%

-33.53%

+14.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.83%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.44%

-8.61%

+7.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

2.16%

-1.76%

Volatility

SHYG vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (SHYG) is 0.94%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that SHYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHYGACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

3.93%

-2.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.51%

10.29%

-7.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.16%

12.78%

-9.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.73%

16.05%

-10.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.42%

17.11%

-10.69%

SHYG vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHYG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHYG vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

SHYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.02%, more than ACWI's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.38%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
SHYG
iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
7.02%7.03%6.93%6.54%5.57%4.83%5.07%5.33%5.90%5.49%5.53%5.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHYG and ACWI have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACWI has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to SHYG (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHYG dropped -19.26% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

On 10-year performance, ACWI leads with 12.85% vs 5.18% for SHYG. On fees, SHYG is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, SHYG has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 12.85% return vs 5.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHYG is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.

SHYG has the higher dividend yield at 7.02%, compared with 1.38% for ACWI.

SHYG is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while ACWI is Global Equities. SHYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield 0-5 Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SHYG and 0.32% for ACWI.

ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHYG and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer