SHY vs. SPTS
SHY (iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF) and SPTS (SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - SHY tracks the ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index while SPTS tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SHY returned 1.65%/yr vs 1.67%/yr for SPTS. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SHY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTS.
Performance
SHY vs. SPTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SHY having a 0.43% return and SPTS slightly higher at 0.45%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SHY having a 1.65% annualized return and SPTS not far ahead at 1.67%.
SHY
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 3.32%
- 3Y*
- 4.03%
- 5Y*
- 1.71%
- 10Y*
- 1.65%
SPTS
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 0.77%
- 1Y
- 3.45%
- 3Y*
- 4.18%
- 5Y*
- 1.81%
- 10Y*
- 1.67%
SHY vs. SPTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHY iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 0.43% | 4.95% | 3.92% | 4.16% | -3.88% | -0.71% | 3.03% | 3.38% | 1.46% | 0.26% |
SPTS SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF | 0.45% | 5.05% | 4.20% | 4.27% | -3.86% | -0.72% | 3.23% | 3.56% | 1.08% | 0.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHY and SPTS is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2011 | 0.71 |
The correlation between SHY and SPTS shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (all time) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHY vs. SPTS — Risk / Return Rank
SHY
SPTS
SHY vs. SPTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY) and SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHY | SPTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.49 | 2.63 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.10 | 4.47 | -0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.55 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | 4.13 | -0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.21 | 16.52 | -1.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHY | SPTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 2.63 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.92 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.06 | 0.98 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.28 | 0.49 | +0.79 |
Drawdowns
SHY vs. SPTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHY drawdown since its inception was -5.71%, roughly equal to the maximum SPTS drawdown of -5.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHY and SPTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHY | SPTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.71% | -5.83% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.89% | -0.84% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.97% | -0.96% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.71% | -5.71% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.71% | -5.71% | 0.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -0.28% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -1.72% | +1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.22% | 0.21% | +0.01% |
Volatility
SHY vs. SPTS - Volatility Comparison
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY) and SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS) have volatilities of 0.35% and 0.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHY | SPTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.35% | 0.34% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.92% | 0.86% | +0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34% | 1.32% | +0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.98% | 1.98% | 0.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.57% | 1.72% | -0.15% |
SHY vs. SPTS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTS's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SHY vs. SPTS - Dividend Comparison
SHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, less than SPTS's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHY iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 3.68% | 3.81% | 3.92% | 2.99% | 1.30% | 0.26% | 0.94% | 2.12% | 1.72% | 0.98% | 0.71% | 0.54% |
SPTS SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF | 3.91% | 3.99% | 4.25% | 3.61% | 1.27% | 0.19% | 0.70% | 2.21% | 2.04% | 1.20% | 0.95% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHY and SPTS have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHY has higher volatility (0.35%) compared to SPTS (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHY dropped -5.71% vs SPTS's -5.83%.
On 10-year performance, SPTS leads with 1.67% vs 1.65% for SHY. On fees, SPTS is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPTS has performed better with a 1.67% return vs 1.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPTS is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SHY.
SPTS has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 3.68% for SHY.
SHY tracks ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while SPTS tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SHY and 0.03% for SPTS.
SPTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHY and SPTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer