PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHY vs. IOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHY vs. IOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHY achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than IOO's 10.84% return. Over the past 10 years, SHY has underperformed IOO with an annualized return of 1.65%, while IOO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.76% annualized return.


SHY

1D
0.05%
1M
0.36%
YTD
0.60%
6M
0.79%
1Y
3.34%
3Y*
4.16%
5Y*
1.78%
10Y*
1.65%

IOO

1D
1.54%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
10.84%
6M
12.35%
1Y
35.77%
3Y*
23.86%
5Y*
16.22%
10Y*
16.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHY vs. IOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHY
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
0.60%4.95%3.92%4.16%-3.88%-0.71%3.03%3.38%1.46%0.26%
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
10.84%27.02%26.54%27.71%-16.34%26.03%18.61%30.01%-6.22%23.56%

Correlation

The correlation between SHY and IOO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2002

-0.17

The correlation between SHY and IOO shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHY vs. IOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHY
SHY Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHY Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHY Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

IOO
IOO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
IOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHY vs. IOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHYIOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.45

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

3.62

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.00

16.01

-1.00

SHY vs. IOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHY Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the IOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHY and IOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHY vs. IOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHY drawdown since its inception was -5.71%, smaller than the maximum IOO drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHY and IOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHYIOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-55.85%

+50.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.89%

-9.94%

+9.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.97%

-19.19%

+18.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.71%

-23.52%

+17.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.71%

-31.43%

+25.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-2.57%

+2.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.52%

-11.26%

+10.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.22%

2.24%

-2.02%

Volatility

SHY vs. IOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY) is 0.40%, while iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that SHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHYIOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.40%

5.00%

-4.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.95%

11.40%

-10.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33%

14.10%

-12.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.99%

17.14%

-15.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.57%

17.81%

-16.24%

SHY vs. IOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IOO's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHY vs. IOO - Dividend Comparison

SHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than IOO's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
1.35%0.92%1.08%1.49%2.00%1.53%1.49%2.02%2.54%2.23%2.75%2.89%
SHY
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
3.68%3.81%3.92%2.99%1.30%0.26%0.94%2.12%1.72%0.98%0.71%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHY and IOO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IOO has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to SHY (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHY dropped -5.71% vs IOO's -55.85%.

On 10-year performance, IOO leads with 16.76% vs 1.65% for SHY. On fees, SHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IOO has performed better with a 16.76% return vs 1.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IOO.

SHY has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.35% for IOO.

SHY is categorized as Government Bonds, while IOO is Global Equities. SHY tracks ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while IOO tracks S&P Global 100 Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SHY and 0.40% for IOO.

IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHY and IOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer