SHV vs. SPMO
SHV (iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHV is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SHV returned 2.23%/yr vs 20.59%/yr for SPMO. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. SHV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
SHV vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHV achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 26.56% return. Over the past 10 years, SHV has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 2.23%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.59% annualized return.
SHV
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 3.89%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- 2.23%
SPMO
- 1D
- 4.80%
- 1M
- 4.24%
- YTD
- 26.56%
- 6M
- 24.30%
- 1Y
- 41.83%
- 3Y*
- 41.24%
- 5Y*
- 23.19%
- 10Y*
- 20.59%
SHV vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 1.51% | 4.21% | 5.12% | 5.04% | 0.94% | -0.10% | 0.81% | 2.36% | 1.72% | 0.67% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 26.56% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHV and SPMO is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHV vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
SHV
SPMO
SHV vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHV | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +17.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +146.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 53.64 | 1.40 | +52.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 430.34 | 3.31 | +427.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2,413.95 | 12.52 | +2,401.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHV vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHV drawdown since its inception was -0.45%, smaller than the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHV and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHV | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.45% | -30.95% | +30.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.01% | -12.70% | +12.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.03% | -20.13% | +20.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.39% | -22.74% | +22.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -0.45% | -30.95% | +30.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.91% | +2.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -4.60% | +4.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 3.35% | -3.35% |
Volatility
SHV vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) is 0.04%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 10.29%. This indicates that SHV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHV | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.04% | 10.29% | -10.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.12% | 16.70% | -16.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20% | 19.45% | -19.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.29% | 19.65% | -19.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.28% | 20.48% | -20.20% |
SHV vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SHV vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
SHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, more than SPMO's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 3.83% | 4.09% | 5.02% | 4.73% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 2.19% | 1.66% | 0.72% | 0.34% | 0.03% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.67% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHV and SPMO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to SHV (0.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHV dropped -0.45% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.59% vs 2.23% for SHV. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SHV has been the lower-risk option at 0.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.59% return vs 2.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SHV.
SHV has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 0.67% for SPMO.
SHV is categorized as Government Bonds, while SPMO is Momentum. SHV tracks ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SHV and 0.13% for SPMO.
SHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.48 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHV and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer