SHV vs. COM
SHV (iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF) and COM (Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHV is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index, while COM is a Commodities fund tracking the Auspice Broad Commodity ER Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SHV returned 3.32%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for COM. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. SHV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for COM.
Performance
SHV vs. COM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHV achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than COM's 15.84% return.
SHV
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.32%
- 10Y*
- 2.23%
COM
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- 15.84%
- 6M
- 15.36%
- 1Y
- 23.40%
- 3Y*
- 7.44%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- —
SHV vs. COM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 1.42% | 4.21% | 5.12% | 5.04% | 0.94% | -0.10% | 0.81% | 2.36% | 1.72% | 0.58% |
COM Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF | 15.84% | 7.72% | 5.81% | -2.09% | 9.17% | 28.00% | 6.63% | -0.18% | -0.03% | -2.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHV and COM is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2017 | -0.02 |
The correlation between SHV and COM shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHV vs. COM — Risk / Return Rank
SHV
COM
SHV vs. COM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) and Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHV | COM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 19.64 | 2.27 | +17.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 150.25 | 3.02 | +147.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 54.02 | 1.43 | +52.58 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 433.49 | 5.48 | +428.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2,436.45 | 15.45 | +2,421.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHV | COM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.64 | 2.27 | +17.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 11.57 | 0.91 | +10.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 8.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.50 | 0.73 | +3.77 |
Drawdowns
SHV vs. COM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHV drawdown since its inception was -0.45%, smaller than the maximum COM drawdown of -15.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHV and COM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHV | COM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.45% | -15.95% | +15.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.01% | -4.33% | +4.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.03% | -8.50% | +8.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.40% | -14.02% | +13.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -0.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.81% | +3.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -6.28% | +6.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 1.54% | -1.54% |
Volatility
SHV vs. COM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) is 0.05%, while Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that SHV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHV | COM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.05% | 3.99% | -3.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.12% | 8.55% | -8.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20% | 10.37% | -10.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.29% | 9.59% | -9.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.28% | 9.77% | -9.49% |
SHV vs. COM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than COM's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHV vs. COM - Dividend Comparison
SHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, more than COM's 2.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COM Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF | 2.44% | 2.99% | 3.88% | 3.80% | 8.59% | 10.32% | 0.13% | 1.09% | 2.36% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 3.83% | 4.09% | 5.02% | 4.73% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 2.19% | 1.66% | 0.72% | 0.34% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHV and COM have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COM has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to SHV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHV dropped -0.45% vs COM's -15.95%.
On 5-year performance, COM leads with 8.66% vs 3.32% for SHV. On fees, SHV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SHV has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COM has performed better with a 8.66% return vs 3.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SHV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for COM.
SHV has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 2.44% for COM.
SHV is categorized as Government Bonds, while COM is Commodities. SHV tracks ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index, while COM tracks Auspice Broad Commodity ER Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SHV and 0.70% for COM.
SHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.64 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHV and COM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer