SHV vs. BNDD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SHV (iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF) and BNDD (Quadratic Deflation ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. SHV is passively managed, while BNDD is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SHV returned 4.64%/yr vs -3.91%/yr for BNDD. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SHV charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for BNDD.

Performance

SHV vs. BNDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) and Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHV achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than BNDD's 4.32% return.

SHV

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.42%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: 3.90%
• 3Y*: 4.64%
• 5Y*: 3.31%
• 10Y*: 2.23%

BNDD

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 1.37%
• YTD: 4.32%
• 6M: 2.24%
• 1Y: 3.39%
• 3Y*: -3.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHV vs. BNDD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF	1.42%	4.21%	5.12%	5.04%	0.94%	-0.05%
BNDD Quadratic Deflation ETF	4.32%	-8.17%	-6.65%	4.02%	-17.48%	5.54%

Correlation

The correlation between SHV and BNDD is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2021	0.05

The correlation between SHV and BNDD shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SHV vs. BNDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHV

SHV Risk / Return Rank: 100
SHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
SHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
SHV Omega Ratio Rank: 100
SHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
SHV Martin Ratio Rank: 100

BNDD

BNDD Risk / Return Rank: 14
BNDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
BNDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
BNDD Omega Ratio Rank: 12
BNDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
BNDD Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHV vs. BNDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) and Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SHV	BNDD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	19.49	0.32	+19.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	149.54	0.52	+149.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	53.77	1.06	+52.70
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	431.38	0.56	+430.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2,419.80	1.20	+2,418.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SHV vs. BNDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHV Sharpe Ratio is 19.49, which is higher than the BNDD Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHV and BNDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SHV	BNDD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.49	0.32	+19.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	11.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	8.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.50	-0.33	+4.83

Drawdowns

SHV vs. BNDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHV drawdown since its inception was -0.45%, smaller than the maximum BNDD drawdown of -30.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHV and BNDD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHV	BNDD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.45%	-30.87%	+30.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.01%	-6.09%	+6.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.03%	-20.75%	+20.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-0.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-0.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-26.51%	+26.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.03%	-19.34%	+19.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.00%	2.83%	-2.83%

Volatility

SHV vs. BNDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) is 0.05%, while Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD) has a volatility of 2.21%. This indicates that SHV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SHV	BNDD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.05%	2.21%	-2.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.12%	8.11%	-7.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20%	10.59%	-10.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.29%	13.38%	-13.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.28%	13.38%	-13.10%

SHV vs. BNDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BNDD's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

SHV vs. BNDD - Dividend Comparison

SHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, more than BNDD's 3.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BNDD Quadratic Deflation ETF	3.61%	3.82%	3.85%	4.30%	43.17%	1.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF	3.83%	4.09%	5.02%	4.73%	1.39%	0.00%	0.74%	2.19%	1.66%	0.72%	0.34%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SHV and BNDD in my portfolio?

SHV and BNDD have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SHV or BNDD?

BNDD has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to SHV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHV dropped -0.45% vs BNDD's -30.87%.

Which ETF is better, SHV or BNDD?

On 3-year performance, SHV leads with 4.64% vs -3.91% for BNDD. On fees, SHV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SHV has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SHV or BNDD?

Over the 3-year period, SHV has performed better with a 4.64% return vs -3.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SHV or BNDD?

SHV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for BNDD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SHV or BNDD?

SHV has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 3.61% for BNDD.

What is the main difference between SHV and BNDD?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SHV and 1.02% for BNDD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.49 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.