SHSSX vs. ETHSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Health Sciences Opportunities Fund Class Institutional (SHSSX) and Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund (ETHSX).
SHSSX is a passively managed fund by BlackRock that tracks the performance of the Russell 3000 HealthCare Index. It was launched on Oct 16, 2000. ETHSX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Jul 25, 1985.
Performance
SHSSX vs. ETHSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SHSSX vs. ETHSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHSSX Health Sciences Opportunities Fund Class Institutional | -6.87% | 16.13% | 4.00% | 3.86% | -5.72% | 12.17% | 19.54% | 25.63% | 8.24% | 25.02% |
ETHSX Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund | -7.98% | 10.23% | 3.48% | 5.67% | -9.41% | 22.02% | 13.04% | 25.99% | 5.87% | 16.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHSSX achieves a -6.87% return, which is significantly higher than ETHSX's -7.98% return. Over the past 10 years, SHSSX has outperformed ETHSX with an annualized return of 9.97%, while ETHSX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.35% annualized return.
SHSSX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -9.09%
- YTD
- -6.87%
- 6M
- 4.09%
- 1Y
- 4.34%
- 3Y*
- 6.17%
- 5Y*
- 4.28%
- 10Y*
- 9.97%
ETHSX
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -9.75%
- YTD
- -7.98%
- 6M
- 2.06%
- 1Y
- -1.98%
- 3Y*
- 3.65%
- 5Y*
- 4.08%
- 10Y*
- 7.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SHSSX vs. ETHSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHSSX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHSX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SHSSX vs. ETHSX — Risk / Return Rank
SHSSX
ETHSX
SHSSX vs. ETHSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Health Sciences Opportunities Fund Class Institutional (SHSSX) and Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund (ETHSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHSSX | ETHSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.29 | -0.10 | +0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.52 | -0.02 | +0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.00 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | -0.19 | +0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.02 | -0.47 | +1.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHSSX | ETHSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 | -0.10 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.28 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.45 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.03 | +0.66 |
Correlation
The correlation between SHSSX and ETHSX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SHSSX vs. ETHSX - Dividend Comparison
SHSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.63%, more than ETHSX's 8.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHSSX Health Sciences Opportunities Fund Class Institutional | 10.63% | 9.90% | 8.68% | 3.82% | 7.20% | 8.96% | 4.18% | 3.87% | 8.44% | 3.59% | 2.33% | 12.29% |
ETHSX Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund | 8.00% | 7.36% | 4.81% | 2.48% | 4.43% | 8.25% | 7.33% | 5.39% | 5.51% | 2.82% | 12.75% | 9.70% |
Drawdowns
SHSSX vs. ETHSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHSSX drawdown since its inception was -35.40%, smaller than the maximum ETHSX drawdown of -90.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHSSX and ETHSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHSSX | ETHSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.40% | -90.06% | +54.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.83% | -11.26% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.90% | -19.58% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.34% | -27.43% | -0.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.56% | -12.40% | +2.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.98% | -53.13% | +47.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 4.49% | -0.32% |
Volatility
SHSSX vs. ETHSX - Volatility Comparison
Health Sciences Opportunities Fund Class Institutional (SHSSX) and Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund (ETHSX) have volatilities of 4.61% and 4.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SHSSX | ETHSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 4.47% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.73% | 10.29% | -0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.32% | 17.63% | -1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.19% | 14.70% | -0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 16.24% | +0.29% |