PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHRY vs. QCLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHRY vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg Shareholder Yield ETF (SHRY) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHRY achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 37.20% return.


SHRY

1D
0.17%
1M
-4.07%
YTD
1.35%
6M
0.93%
1Y
3.11%
3Y*
12.30%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*

QCLN

1D
-6.27%
1M
-3.52%
YTD
37.20%
6M
31.57%
1Y
92.03%
3Y*
8.84%
5Y*
-1.13%
10Y*
16.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHRY vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHRY
First Trust Bloomberg Shareholder Yield ETF
1.35%7.29%17.27%17.47%-14.21%30.50%11.86%30.69%-9.35%10.45%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
37.20%31.81%-18.86%-10.02%-30.37%-3.21%184.00%42.65%-12.38%14.80%

Correlation

The correlation between SHRY and QCLN is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2017

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between SHRY and QCLN has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SHRY vs. QCLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SHRY
QCLN

Financial Services

22.7%
1.4%

Technology

20.5%
47.6%

Communication Services

12.4%

-

Energy

10.2%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

10.0%

-

Industrials

8.1%
24.8%

Healthcare

8.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
10.2%

Basic Materials

0.7%
7.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

8.1%

Financial Services

SHRY
22.7%
QCLN
1.4%

Technology

SHRY
20.5%
QCLN
47.6%

Communication Services

SHRY
12.4%
QCLN

-

Energy

SHRY
10.2%
QCLN
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

SHRY
10.0%
QCLN

-

Industrials

SHRY
8.1%
QCLN
24.8%

Healthcare

SHRY
8.1%
QCLN

-

Consumer Cyclical

SHRY
7.4%
QCLN
10.2%

Basic Materials

SHRY
0.7%
QCLN
7.8%

Real Estate

SHRY

-

QCLN

-

Utilities

SHRY

-

QCLN
8.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHRY vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHRY
SHRY Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
SHRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHRY Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
SHRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHRY Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

QCLN
QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHRY vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Shareholder Yield ETF (SHRY) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHRYQCLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.37

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

5.64

-5.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.11

18.14

-17.03

SHRY vs. QCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHRY Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the QCLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHRY and QCLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHRY vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHRY drawdown since its inception was -36.67%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHRY and QCLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHRYQCLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.67%

-76.18%

+39.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.20%

-16.40%

+9.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.34%

-56.08%

+40.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.94%

-69.49%

+45.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.40%

-29.12%

+22.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.03%

-43.40%

+38.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

5.09%

-2.28%

Volatility

SHRY vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Bloomberg Shareholder Yield ETF (SHRY) is 3.30%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 17.77%. This indicates that SHRY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHRYQCLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

17.77%

-14.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.74%

29.96%

-22.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.90%

37.45%

-26.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.68%

38.54%

-22.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.16%

35.21%

-17.05%

SHRY vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHRY has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLN's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHRY vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

SHRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than QCLN's 0.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
0.16%0.25%0.87%0.76%0.33%0.01%0.30%0.85%1.03%0.45%1.24%0.72%
SHRY
First Trust Bloomberg Shareholder Yield ETF
1.74%1.73%1.76%1.49%1.52%0.98%1.65%1.54%1.89%0.55%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHRY and QCLN have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QCLN has higher volatility (17.77%) compared to SHRY (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHRY dropped -36.67% vs QCLN's -76.18%.

On 5-year performance, SHRY leads with 7.45% vs -1.13% for QCLN. On fees, QCLN is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, SHRY has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SHRY has performed better with a 7.45% return vs -1.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QCLN is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SHRY.

SHRY has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.16% for QCLN.

SHRY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QCLN is Alternative Energy Equities. SHRY tracks Bloomberg Shareholder Yield Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while QCLN tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SHRY and 0.59% for QCLN.

QCLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHRY and QCLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer