SHRY vs. HGER
SHRY (First Trust Bloomberg Shareholder Yield ETF) and HGER (Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHRY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Shareholder Yield Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while HGER is a Commodities fund tracking the Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SHRY returned 13.90%/yr vs 21.26%/yr for HGER. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SHRY charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for HGER.
Performance
SHRY vs. HGER - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHRY achieves a 4.24% return, which is significantly lower than HGER's 28.12% return.
SHRY
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- 4.24%
- 6M
- 5.20%
- 1Y
- 6.62%
- 3Y*
- 13.90%
- 5Y*
- 7.87%
- 10Y*
- —
HGER
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -2.72%
- YTD
- 28.12%
- 6M
- 27.93%
- 1Y
- 41.90%
- 3Y*
- 21.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHRY vs. HGER - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHRY First Trust Bloomberg Shareholder Yield ETF | 4.24% | 7.29% | 17.27% | 17.47% | -10.08% |
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF | 28.12% | 20.08% | 9.25% | 1.93% | 9.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHRY and HGER is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2022 | 0.14 |
The correlation between SHRY and HGER shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SHRY vs. HGER - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SHRY
HGER
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
SHRY
HGER
-
Technology
SHRY
HGER
-
Communication Services
SHRY
HGER
-
Energy
SHRY
HGER
-
Consumer Defensive
SHRY
HGER
-
Healthcare
SHRY
HGER
-
Industrials
SHRY
HGER
-
Consumer Cyclical
SHRY
HGER
-
Basic Materials
SHRY
HGER
Real Estate
SHRY
-
HGER
-
Utilities
SHRY
-
HGER
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHRY vs. HGER — Risk / Return Rank
SHRY
HGER
SHRY vs. HGER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Shareholder Yield ETF (SHRY) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHRY | HGER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.46 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 5.20 | -4.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.54 | 17.52 | -14.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHRY | HGER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 2.50 | -1.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.90 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
SHRY vs. HGER - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHRY drawdown since its inception was -36.67%, which is greater than HGER's maximum drawdown of -23.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHRY and HGER.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHRY | HGER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.67% | -23.31% | -13.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.20% | -8.09% | +0.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.34% | -8.84% | -6.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.73% | -4.99% | +1.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.03% | -7.66% | +2.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 2.40% | +0.22% |
Volatility
SHRY vs. HGER - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Bloomberg Shareholder Yield ETF (SHRY) is 2.31%, while Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) has a volatility of 4.02%. This indicates that SHRY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HGER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHRY | HGER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.31% | 4.02% | -1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.51% | 14.54% | -7.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.78% | 16.87% | -6.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.67% | 17.62% | -1.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 17.62% | +0.56% |
SHRY vs. HGER - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHRY has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than HGER's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHRY vs. HGER - Dividend Comparison
SHRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than HGER's 5.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF | 5.53% | 7.09% | 3.28% | 7.24% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHRY First Trust Bloomberg Shareholder Yield ETF | 1.69% | 1.73% | 1.76% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 0.98% | 1.65% | 1.54% | 1.89% | 0.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHRY and HGER have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HGER has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to SHRY (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHRY dropped -36.67% vs HGER's -23.31%.
On 3-year performance, HGER leads with 21.26% vs 13.90% for SHRY. On fees, SHRY is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SHRY has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HGER has performed better with a 21.26% return vs 13.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SHRY is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for HGER.
HGER has the higher dividend yield at 5.53%, compared with 1.69% for SHRY.
SHRY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while HGER is Commodities. SHRY tracks Bloomberg Shareholder Yield Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while HGER tracks Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SHRY and 0.68% for HGER.
HGER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHRY and HGER
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer