SHRT vs. SARK
SHRT (Gotham Short Strategies ETF) and SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SHRT returned -21.62% vs -35.40% for SARK. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SHRT charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SARK.
Performance
SHRT vs. SARK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHRT achieves a -17.15% return, which is significantly lower than SARK's -9.16% return.
SHRT
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -3.02%
- YTD
- -17.15%
- 6M
- -15.15%
- 1Y
- -21.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SARK
- 1D
- -2.55%
- 1M
- -5.04%
- YTD
- -9.16%
- 6M
- -2.48%
- 1Y
- -35.40%
- 3Y*
- -31.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHRT vs. SARK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SHRT Gotham Short Strategies ETF | -17.15% | -0.91% | -1.44% | -5.83% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -9.16% | -25.93% | -36.90% | -24.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHRT and SARK is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023 | 0.45 |
The correlation between SHRT and SARK shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHRT vs. SARK — Risk / Return Rank
SHRT
SARK
SHRT vs. SARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHRT | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | 0.85 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | -0.87 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.06 | -1.16 | -0.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHRT | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.66 | -0.99 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.79 | -0.25 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
SHRT vs. SARK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHRT drawdown since its inception was -25.98%, smaller than the maximum SARK drawdown of -81.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHRT and SARK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHRT | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.98% | -81.07% | +55.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.73% | -40.75% | +18.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -74.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.70% | -79.95% | +54.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.15% | -46.49% | +38.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.49% | 30.56% | -20.07% |
Volatility
SHRT vs. SARK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT) is 4.19%, while Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) has a volatility of 9.19%. This indicates that SHRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SARK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHRT | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.19% | 9.19% | -5.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.94% | 25.16% | -14.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.04% | 35.98% | -22.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.77% | 56.23% | -43.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.77% | 56.23% | -43.46% |
SHRT vs. SARK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHRT has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SARK's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHRT vs. SARK - Dividend Comparison
SHRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than SARK's 3.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 3.10% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% |
SHRT Gotham Short Strategies ETF | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.85% | 0.27% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHRT and SARK have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SARK has higher volatility (9.19%) compared to SHRT (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHRT dropped -25.98% vs SARK's -81.07%.
On 1-year performance, SHRT leads with -21.62% vs -35.40% for SARK. On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SHRT has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SHRT has performed better with a -21.62% return vs -35.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for SHRT.
SARK has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 0.08% for SHRT.
They also come from different issuers: Gotham and AXS. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for SHRT and 0.75% for SARK.
SARK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.99 vs -1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHRT and SARK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer