SHRT vs. FWD

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

SHRT (Gotham Short Strategies ETF) and FWD (AB Disruptors ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHRT is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Gotham, while FWD is a Global Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SHRT returned -17.31% vs 43.56% for FWD. At a correlation of -0.56, they often move in opposite directions. SHRT charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FWD.

Performance

SHRT vs. FWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHRT achieves a -15.36% return, which is significantly lower than FWD's 23.84% return.

SHRT

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -0.84%
• 6M: -11.10%
• YTD: -15.36%
• 1Y: -17.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FWD

• 1D: -3.44%
• 1M: -9.53%
• 6M: 14.25%
• YTD: 23.84%
• 1Y: 43.56%
• 3Y*: 30.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHRT vs. FWD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SHRT Gotham Short Strategies ETF	-15.36%	-0.91%	-1.44%	-5.51%
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	23.84%	32.00%	29.23%	17.06%

Correlation

The correlation between SHRT and FWD is -0.59, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2023	-0.56

The correlation between SHRT and FWD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.59 to -0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

SHRT vs. FWD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SHRT	FWD
Basic Materials	18.1%	1.9%
Technology	17.3%	59.8%
Industrials	12.6%	19.3%
Healthcare	10.7%	6.9%
Energy	8.7%	2.6%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	3.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	0.8%
Communication Services	3.0%	3.4%
Financial Services	3.0%	0.5%
Utilities	0.0%	0.3%
Real Estate	-	0.7%

Return for Risk

SHRT vs. FWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHRT

SHRT Risk / Return Rank: 1
SHRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
SHRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
SHRT Omega Ratio Rank: 1
SHRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
SHRT Martin Ratio Rank: 0

FWD

FWD Risk / Return Rank: 62
FWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
FWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
FWD Omega Ratio Rank: 52
FWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FWD Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHRT vs. FWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SHRT	FWD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.24	1.54	-2.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.81	2.02	-3.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	1.26	-0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.82	3.33	-4.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.85	10.23	-12.08

SHRT vs. FWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHRT Sharpe Ratio is -1.24, which is lower than the FWD Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHRT and FWD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SHRT vs. FWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHRT drawdown since its inception was -27.84%, roughly equal to the maximum FWD drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHRT and FWD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHRT	FWD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.84%	-29.02%	+1.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.19%	-13.13%	-8.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.09%	-13.13%	-10.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.83%	-4.12%	-4.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.53%	4.27%	+5.26%

Volatility

SHRT vs. FWD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT) is 5.37%, while AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) has a volatility of 12.13%. This indicates that SHRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SHRT	FWD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.37%	12.13%	-6.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.94%	23.80%	-11.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.02%	28.42%	-14.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.97%	25.79%	-12.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.97%	25.79%	-12.82%

SHRT vs. FWD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHRT has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FWD's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

SHRT vs. FWD - Dividend Comparison

SHRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than FWD's 0.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	0.09%	0.11%	1.89%	0.00%
SHRT Gotham Short Strategies ETF	0.08%	0.07%	0.85%	0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SHRT and FWD in my portfolio?

SHRT and FWD have a correlation of -0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SHRT or FWD?

FWD has higher volatility (12.13%) compared to SHRT (5.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHRT dropped -27.84% vs FWD's -29.02%.

Which ETF is better, SHRT or FWD?

On 1-year performance, FWD leads with 43.56% vs -17.31% for SHRT. On fees, FWD is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, SHRT has been the lower-risk option at 5.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SHRT or FWD?

Over the 1-year period, FWD has performed better with a 43.56% return vs -17.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SHRT or FWD?

FWD is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for SHRT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SHRT or FWD?

SHRT and FWD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.08%.

What is the main difference between SHRT and FWD?

SHRT is categorized as Inverse Equities, while FWD is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Gotham and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for SHRT and 0.65% for FWD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.