SHPIX vs. RYCLX
SHPIX (ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund) and RYCLX (Rydex Inverse Mid-Cap Strategy Fund) are both Inverse Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SHPIX returned 9.15%/yr vs -11.35%/yr for RYCLX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SHPIX charges 1.78%/yr vs 2.39%/yr for RYCLX.
Performance
SHPIX vs. RYCLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHPIX achieves a -16.89% return, which is significantly lower than RYCLX's -12.87% return. Over the past 10 years, SHPIX has outperformed RYCLX with an annualized return of 9.15%, while RYCLX has yielded a comparatively lower -11.35% annualized return.
SHPIX
- 1D
- -2.09%
- 1M
- -3.75%
- YTD
- -16.89%
- 6M
- -14.24%
- 1Y
- -28.65%
- 3Y*
- 9.00%
- 5Y*
- 46.82%
- 10Y*
- 9.15%
RYCLX
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -3.05%
- YTD
- -12.87%
- 6M
- -11.02%
- 1Y
- -16.51%
- 3Y*
- -8.00%
- 5Y*
- -6.44%
- 10Y*
- -11.35%
SHPIX vs. RYCLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHPIX ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund | -16.89% | -9.61% | 83.27% | 344.97% | 16.39% | -19.78% | -31.60% | -20.89% | 9.96% | -14.49% |
RYCLX Rydex Inverse Mid-Cap Strategy Fund | -12.87% | -1.04% | -5.59% | -8.75% | 8.93% | -24.21% | -25.53% | -21.03% | 11.39% | -14.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHPIX and RYCLX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005 | 0.95 |
The correlation between SHPIX and RYCLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHPIX vs. RYCLX — Risk / Return Rank
SHPIX
RYCLX
SHPIX vs. RYCLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund (SHPIX) and Rydex Inverse Mid-Cap Strategy Fund (RYCLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHPIX | RYCLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 0.84 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | -0.94 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.71 | -1.84 | +0.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHPIX vs. RYCLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHPIX drawdown since its inception was -96.86%, roughly equal to the maximum RYCLX drawdown of -95.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHPIX and RYCLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHPIX | RYCLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.86% | -95.61% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.89% | -17.57% | -10.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.69% | -31.65% | -9.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.69% | -34.22% | -6.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.45% | -71.64% | +1.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.90% | -95.59% | +19.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.99% | -70.23% | -4.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.68% | 8.97% | +7.71% |
Volatility
SHPIX vs. RYCLX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund (SHPIX) has a higher volatility of 6.73% compared to Rydex Inverse Mid-Cap Strategy Fund (RYCLX) at 4.89%. This indicates that SHPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYCLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHPIX | RYCLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.73% | 4.89% | +1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.36% | 11.74% | +2.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.65% | 15.86% | +3.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 188.94% | 20.58% | +168.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 134.61% | 21.48% | +113.13% |
SHPIX vs. RYCLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHPIX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is lower than RYCLX's 2.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHPIX vs. RYCLX - Dividend Comparison
SHPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.30%, less than RYCLX's 37.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCLX Rydex Inverse Mid-Cap Strategy Fund | 37.88% | 33.01% | 25.75% | 9.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.76% | 0.89% |
SHPIX ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund | 33.30% | 5.70% | 0.00% | 17.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, SHPIX and RYCLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SHPIX has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to RYCLX (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHPIX dropped -96.86% vs RYCLX's -95.61%.
RYCLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.04 vs -1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHPIX and RYCLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer