SHOC vs. MAGS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SHOC (Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHOC is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index, while MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. SHOC is passively managed, while MAGS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SHOC returned 40.54%/yr vs 28.94%/yr for MAGS. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SHOC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MAGS.

Performance

SHOC vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SHOC

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: -7.69%
• 6M: 32.26%
• YTD: 46.90%
• 1Y: 85.23%
• 3Y*: 40.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 44.63%

MAGS

• 1D: 3.19%
• 1M: 1.32%
• 6M: -0.29%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 1Y: 17.98%
• 3Y*: 28.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 35.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	$254.73M	$303.60M	$278.63M
SHOC Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF	$1.25M	$1.87M	$2.57M

SHOC vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SHOC Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF	46.90%	49.91%	16.74%	33.22%
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	0.00%	22.99%	63.97%	35.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SHOC and MAGS is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2023	0.66

The correlation between SHOC and MAGS shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.68 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SHOC vs. MAGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SHOC	MAGS
Technology	100.0%	13.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	6.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	6.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SHOC vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SHOC

SHOC Risk / Return Rank: 84
SHOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
SHOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
SHOC Omega Ratio Rank: 79
SHOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
SHOC Martin Ratio Rank: 89

MAGS

MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 27
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 26
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SHOC vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SHOC	MAGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	0.64	+1.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	1.01	+1.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.12	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	0.77	+2.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.55	2.26	+11.29

SHOC vs. MAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHOC Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the MAGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHOC and MAGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SHOC vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHOC drawdown since its inception was -37.54%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHOC and MAGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHOC	MAGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.54%	-29.91%	-7.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.20%	-18.62%	-6.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.54%	-29.91%	-7.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.15%	-7.02%	-12.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.59%	-4.86%	-2.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.11%	6.31%	-0.20%

Volatility

SHOC vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison

Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) has a higher volatility of 16.48% compared to Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) at 8.02%. This indicates that SHOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SHOC	MAGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.48%	8.02%	+8.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.09%	17.37%	+16.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.12%	22.30%	+17.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.87%	26.09%	+10.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.87%	26.09%	+10.78%

SHOC vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHOC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

SHOC vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

SHOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than MAGS's 1.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.48%	1.48%	0.81%	0.44%	0.00%
SHOC Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF	0.14%	0.23%	0.35%	0.65%	0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SHOC and MAGS in my portfolio?

SHOC and MAGS have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SHOC or MAGS?

SHOC has higher volatility (16.48%) compared to MAGS (8.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHOC dropped -37.54% vs MAGS's -29.91%.

Which ETF is better, SHOC or MAGS?

On 3-year performance, SHOC leads with 40.54% vs 28.94% for MAGS. On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, MAGS has been the lower-risk option at 8.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SHOC or MAGS?

Over the 3-year period, SHOC has performed better with a 40.54% return vs 28.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SHOC or MAGS?

MAGS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SHOC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SHOC or MAGS?

MAGS has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 0.14% for SHOC.

What is the main difference between SHOC and MAGS?

SHOC is categorized as Semiconductors, while MAGS is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Strive and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SHOC and 0.30% for MAGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SHOC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.