SHOC vs. XLG
Compare and contrast key facts about Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG).
SHOC and XLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SHOC is a passively managed fund by Strive that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Oct 5, 2022. XLG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell Top 50 Index. It was launched on May 10, 2005. Both SHOC and XLG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SHOC or XLG.
Performance
SHOC vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHOC achieves a 15.67% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 31.07% return.
SHOC
15.67%
-3.31%
-0.48%
30.79%
N/A
N/A
XLG
31.07%
1.26%
13.90%
35.47%
18.40%
14.92%
Key characteristics
| SHOC | XLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.82 | 2.38 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.26 | 3.13 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.16 | 1.44 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.10 | 3.10 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.70 | 12.85 |
| Ulcer Index | 10.49% | 2.73% |
| Daily Std Dev | 34.60% | 14.75% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.71% | -52.39% |
| Current Drawdown | -16.38% | -1.36% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SHOC vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHOC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between SHOC and XLG is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SHOC vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SHOC vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
SHOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than XLG's 0.73% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHOC Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF | 0.41% | 0.65% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF | 0.73% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% | 1.97% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
SHOC vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHOC drawdown since its inception was -25.71%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHOC and XLG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SHOC vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) has a higher volatility of 8.66% compared to Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 5.00%. This indicates that SHOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.