SHMMX vs. FMBIX
SHMMX (Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund) and FMBIX (Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SHMMX charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for FMBIX.
Performance
SHMMX vs. FMBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SHMMX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 2.46%
- 1Y
- 8.04%
- 3Y*
- 4.44%
- 5Y*
- 1.23%
- 10Y*
- 2.30%
FMBIX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHMMX vs. FMBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHMMX Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund | 2.01% | 4.42% | 2.90% | 7.17% | -10.11% | 2.74% | 4.23% | 2.23% |
FMBIX Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.60% | 1.32% | 5.89% | -10.00% | 1.14% | 3.10% | 1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHMMX and FMBIX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019 | 0.83 |
The correlation between SHMMX and FMBIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (3 years) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHMMX vs. FMBIX — Risk / Return Rank
SHMMX
FMBIX
SHMMX vs. FMBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund (SHMMX) and Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund (FMBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHMMX | FMBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.18 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHMMX | FMBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | — | — |
Drawdowns
SHMMX vs. FMBIX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHMMX | FMBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.86% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | — | — |
Volatility
SHMMX vs. FMBIX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHMMX | FMBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.19% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.11% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.20% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.26% | — | — |
SHMMX vs. FMBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHMMX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FMBIX's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHMMX vs. FMBIX - Dividend Comparison
SHMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, while FMBIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMBIX Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.70% | 2.60% | 2.29% | 1.17% | 1.28% | 1.59% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHMMX Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund | 3.45% | 4.53% | 3.87% | 3.73% | 2.82% | 2.05% | 2.73% | 3.59% | 3.82% | 3.89% | 3.79% | 3.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHMMX and FMBIX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SHMMX and FMBIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer