PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHMMX vs. FBND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHMMX vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund (SHMMX) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHMMX achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly higher than FBND's -0.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SHMMX has underperformed FBND with an annualized return of 2.03%, while FBND has yielded a comparatively higher 2.27% annualized return.


SHMMX

1D
-0.20%
1M
-1.93%
6M
0.09%
YTD
0.79%
1Y
5.98%
3Y*
3.75%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*
2.03%
ALL TIME*
5.04%

FBND

1D
-0.27%
1M
-1.26%
6M
-0.60%
YTD
-0.33%
1Y
2.08%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
0.31%
10Y*
2.27%
ALL TIME*
2.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$133.84M$127.41M$124.15M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SHMMX vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHMMX
Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund
0.79%4.42%2.90%7.17%-10.11%2.74%4.23%7.49%0.44%5.54%
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
-0.33%7.57%2.13%6.81%-12.54%-0.43%9.41%9.82%-0.57%3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SHMMX and FBND is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2014

0.46

The correlation between SHMMX and FBND shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.59 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHMMX vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SHMMX
SHMMX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SHMMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHMMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHMMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SHMMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHMMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FBND
FBND Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SHMMX vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund (SHMMX) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHMMXFBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.13

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

1.09

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.89

2.77

+6.12

SHMMX vs. FBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHMMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHMMX and FBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHMMX vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHMMX drawdown since its inception was -16.40%, roughly equal to the maximum FBND drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHMMX and FBND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHMMXFBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.40%

-17.25%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

-2.66%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.66%

-4.95%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.96%

-17.25%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.96%

-17.25%

+2.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-2.24%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

-3.32%

+1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

1.05%

-0.26%

Volatility

SHMMX vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund (SHMMX) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) have volatilities of 0.98% and 0.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHMMXFBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

0.95%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.30%

2.94%

-0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91%

3.77%

-0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.22%

5.93%

-1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.27%

6.10%

-1.83%

SHMMX vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHMMX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHMMX vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

SHMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than FBND's 4.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
4.77%4.70%4.73%4.26%3.07%1.86%4.25%2.90%2.93%2.56%2.84%3.26%
SHMMX
Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund
3.22%4.53%3.87%3.73%2.82%2.05%2.73%3.59%3.82%3.89%3.79%3.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHMMX and FBND have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHMMX has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to FBND (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHMMX dropped -16.40% vs FBND's -17.25%.

SHMMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHMMX and FBND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer