PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHMDX vs. IMCDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHMDX vs. IMCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Mkts Debt (SHMDX) and Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SHMDX

1D
-0.25%
1M
1.84%
YTD
4.39%
6M
4.65%
1Y
15.28%
3Y*
12.87%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
4.32%

IMCDX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHMDX vs. IMCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHMDX
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Mkts Debt
4.39%15.13%8.90%14.81%-19.74%-2.52%7.06%15.20%-7.86%11.58%
IMCDX
Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund
0.00%0.00%6.44%8.51%-13.79%0.08%8.35%13.65%-1.77%9.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SHMDX and IMCDX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2012

0.63

The correlation between SHMDX and IMCDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (3 years) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHMDX vs. IMCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHMDX
SHMDX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SHMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SHMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

IMCDX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHMDX vs. IMCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Mkts Debt (SHMDX) and Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHMDXIMCDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.82

SHMDX vs. IMCDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHMDX vs. IMCDX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHMDXIMCDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

Volatility

SHMDX vs. IMCDX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHMDXIMCDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.60%

SHMDX vs. IMCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHMDX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCDX's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHMDX vs. IMCDX - Dividend Comparison

SHMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.20%, while IMCDX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMCDX
Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund
0.00%0.00%4.08%4.21%3.80%6.14%4.64%4.99%5.30%4.79%5.22%5.11%
SHMDX
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Mkts Debt
6.20%6.21%6.73%8.10%10.70%4.78%5.24%5.51%6.80%6.12%6.72%6.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHMDX and IMCDX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHMDX and IMCDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer