SHLD vs. DFNS.L
SHLD (Global X Defense Tech ETF) and DFNS.L (VanEck Defense UCITS ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds - SHLD tracks the Global X Defense Tech Index while DFNS.L tracks the MarketVector™ Global Defense Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SHLD returned 9.71% vs 15.78% for DFNS.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SHLD charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for DFNS.L.
Performance
SHLD vs. DFNS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHLD achieves a -2.28% return, which is significantly lower than DFNS.L's 2.88% return.
SHLD
- 1D
- -2.39%
- 1M
- -7.01%
- YTD
- -2.28%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- 9.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFNS.L
- 1D
- -1.80%
- 1M
- -5.10%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 8.71%
- 1Y
- 15.78%
- 3Y*
- 42.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHLD vs. DFNS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF | -2.28% | 74.16% | 35.03% | 12.89% |
DFNS.L VanEck Defense UCITS ETF | 2.88% | 68.21% | 43.74% | 8.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHLD and DFNS.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023 | 0.75 |
The correlation between SHLD and DFNS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHLD vs. DFNS.L — Risk / Return Rank
SHLD
DFNS.L
SHLD vs. DFNS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) and VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHLD | DFNS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.41 | 0.63 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.74 | 1.06 | -0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.12 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | 0.84 | -0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.30 | 2.09 | -0.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHLD | DFNS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | 0.63 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.00 | 2.01 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
SHLD vs. DFNS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHLD drawdown since its inception was -20.10%, which is greater than DFNS.L's maximum drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHLD and DFNS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHLD | DFNS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.10% | -18.72% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.10% | -18.72% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.85% | -15.86% | -2.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.19% | -3.39% | +0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.51% | 7.50% | +0.01% |
Volatility
SHLD vs. DFNS.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) and VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNS.L) have volatilities of 7.81% and 8.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHLD | DFNS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.81% | 8.07% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.35% | 19.53% | -0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.05% | 24.88% | -0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.13% | 21.56% | -0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.13% | 21.56% | -0.43% |
SHLD vs. DFNS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHLD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DFNS.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHLD vs. DFNS.L - Dividend Comparison
SHLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, while DFNS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DFNS.L VanEck Defense UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF | 0.56% | 0.55% | 0.53% | 0.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHLD and DFNS.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SHLD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SHLD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DFNS.L.
SHLD tracks Global X Defense Tech Index, while DFNS.L tracks MarketVector™ Global Defense Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SHLD and 0.55% for DFNS.L.
Find the right allocation for SHLD and DFNS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer