PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SHLD.TO vs. QQCC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

SHLD.TO vs. QQCC.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Defence Tech Index ETF (SHLD.TO) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO).

SHLD.TO and QQCC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SHLD.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Global X Defense Tech Index. It was launched on Apr 21, 2025. QQCC.TO is managed by Global X. It was launched on Sep 13, 2011.

Performance

SHLD.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Defence Tech Index ETF (SHLD.TO) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SHLD.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
SHLD.TO
Global X Defence Tech Index ETF		11.06%28.13%
QQCC.TO
Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF		-3.61%23.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHLD.TO achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly higher than QQCC.TO's -3.61% return.

SHLD.TO

1D
3.91%
1M
-3.17%
YTD
11.06%
6M
1.41%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

QQCC.TO

1D
1.82%
1M
-3.14%
YTD
-3.61%
6M
-1.75%
1Y
15.14%
3Y*
18.64%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
9.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X Defence Tech Index ETF

Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF

Often compared with SHLD.TO:
SHLD.TO vs. XAD.TOSHLD.TO vs. SHLDSHLD.TO vs. FSDAXSHLD.TO vs. XARSHLD.TO vs. KDEFSHLD.TO vs. XEQT.TOSHLD.TO vs. VCE.TO
Often compared with QQCC.TO:
QQCC.TO vs. QQCL.TOQQCC.TO vs. QQC.TOQQCC.TO vs. QQQIQQCC.TO vs. QQQQQCC.TO vs. NVDA.TOQQCC.TO vs. XQQ.TOQQCC.TO vs. HXQ.TO

SHLD.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHLD.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than QQCC.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.

QQCC.TO
Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF
SHLD.TO
Global X Defence Tech Index ETF

Return for Risk

SHLD.TO vs. QQCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SHLD.TO
QQCC.TO
QQCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
QQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHLD.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Defence Tech Index ETF (SHLD.TO) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SHLD.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

SHLD.TOQQCC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

—

0.75

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.73

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.53

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.92

-0.00

+1.92

Correlation

The correlation between SHLD.TO and QQCC.TO is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SHLD.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

SHLD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than QQCC.TO's 11.12% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SHLD.TO
Global X Defence Tech Index ETF		0.16%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQCC.TO
Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF		11.12%11.27%9.89%11.85%11.04%5.15%5.84%6.31%7.90%6.01%6.73%8.89%

Drawdowns

SHLD.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHLD.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.91%, smaller than the maximum QQCC.TO drawdown of -100.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHLD.TO and QQCC.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

SHLD.TOQQCC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.91%

-100.13%

+85.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-13.73%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-22.24%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-36.70%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.30%

-100.00%

+88.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.47%

-99.78%

+95.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

3.15%

—

Volatility

SHLD.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

SHLD.TOQQCC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

5.36%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

10.43%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.64%

20.26%

+4.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.64%

17.51%

+7.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.64%

17.30%

+7.34%