SHLD.TO vs. KDEF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Defence Tech Index ETF (SHLD.TO) and PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF).

SHLD.TO and KDEF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SHLD.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Global X Defense Tech Index. It was launched on Apr 21, 2025. KDEF is a passively managed fund by PLUS that tracks the performance of the The Korea Defence Industry Index. It was launched on Feb 5, 2025. Both SHLD.TO and KDEF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

SHLD.TO vs. KDEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Defence Tech Index ETF (SHLD.TO) and PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SHLD.TO vs. KDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SHLD.TO Global X Defence Tech Index ETF	11.06%	28.13%
KDEF PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF	21.79%	56.40%

Different Trading Currencies

SHLD.TO is traded in CAD, while KDEF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KDEF values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHLD.TO achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly lower than KDEF's 21.79% return.

SHLD.TO

• 1D: 3.91%
• 1M: -3.17%
• YTD: 11.06%
• 6M: 1.41%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KDEF

• 1D: 2.53%
• 1M: -11.68%
• YTD: 21.79%
• 6M: 11.30%
• 1Y: 114.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHLD.TO vs. KDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHLD.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than KDEF's 0.65% expense ratio.

KDEF

PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF

SHLD.TO

Global X Defence Tech Index ETF

Return for Risk

SHLD.TO vs. KDEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KDEF

KDEF Risk / Return Rank: 95
KDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
KDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
KDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 91
KDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
KDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHLD.TO vs. KDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Defence Tech Index ETF (SHLD.TO) and PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SHLD.TO	KDEF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.92	2.86	-0.94

Correlation

The correlation between SHLD.TO and KDEF is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

SHLD.TO vs. KDEF - Dividend Comparison

SHLD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than KDEF's 4.21% yield.

	TTM	2025
SHLD.TO Global X Defence Tech Index ETF	0.16%	0.18%
KDEF PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF	4.21%	5.06%

Drawdowns

SHLD.TO vs. KDEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHLD.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.91%, smaller than the maximum KDEF drawdown of -21.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHLD.TO and KDEF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHLD.TO	KDEF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.91%	-22.51%	+7.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-22.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.30%	-18.37%	+7.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.47%	-5.83%	+1.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.08%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SHLD.TO	KDEF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	19.07%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	32.59%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.64%	42.75%	-18.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.64%	44.14%	-19.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.64%	44.14%	-19.50%