PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHLD.TO vs. CEF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SHLD.TO vs. CEF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Defence Tech Index ETF (SHLD.TO) and Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SHLD.TO vs. CEF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SHLD.TO
Global X Defence Tech Index ETF
11.06%28.13%
CEF.TO
Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust
5.65%57.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHLD.TO achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly higher than CEF.TO's 5.65% return.


SHLD.TO

1D
3.91%
1M
-3.17%
YTD
11.06%
6M
1.41%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CEF.TO

1D
5.05%
1M
-13.87%
YTD
5.65%
6M
29.93%
1Y
62.63%
3Y*
37.45%
5Y*
24.45%
10Y*
15.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHLD.TO vs. CEF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHLD.TO

CEF.TO
CEF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CEF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CEF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHLD.TO vs. CEF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Defence Tech Index ETF (SHLD.TO) and Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SHLD.TO vs. CEF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHLD.TOCEF.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.92

0.15

+1.77

Correlation

The correlation between SHLD.TO and CEF.TO is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SHLD.TO vs. CEF.TO - Dividend Comparison

SHLD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, while CEF.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SHLD.TO
Global X Defence Tech Index ETF
0.16%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CEF.TO
Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.09%0.09%

Drawdowns

SHLD.TO vs. CEF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHLD.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.91%, smaller than the maximum CEF.TO drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHLD.TO and CEF.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SHLD.TOCEF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.91%

-58.68%

+43.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.30%

-17.81%

+6.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.47%

-30.46%

+25.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.06%

Volatility

SHLD.TO vs. CEF.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SHLD.TOCEF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.64%

35.75%

-11.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.64%

22.38%

+2.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.64%

21.07%

+3.57%