PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHLD.L vs. HNSS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHLD.L vs. HNSS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Dist (SHLD.L) and HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF (HNSS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SHLD.L is traded in USD, while HNSS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HNSS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHLD.L achieves a 17.77% return, which is significantly lower than HNSS.L's 86.71% return.


SHLD.L

1D
0.11%
1M
3.71%
6M
17.56%
YTD
17.77%
1Y
25.07%
3Y*
19.63%
5Y*
9.32%
10Y*

HNSS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-6.96%
6M
70.76%
YTD
86.71%
1Y
145.99%
3Y*
56.55%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHLD.L vs. HNSS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SHLD.L
iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Dist
17.77%11.51%16.55%33.91%-16.72%
HNSS.L
HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF
86.71%56.48%17.97%39.90%-33.45%

Correlation

The correlation between SHLD.L and HNSS.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2022

0.62

The correlation between SHLD.L and HNSS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHLD.L vs. HNSS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHLD.L
SHLD.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SHLD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

HNSS.L
HNSS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HNSS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HNSS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HNSS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HNSS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
HNSS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHLD.L vs. HNSS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Dist (SHLD.L) and HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF (HNSS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHLD.LHNSS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.50

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

4.73

-2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.84

12.45

-7.61

SHLD.L vs. HNSS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHLD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the HNSS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHLD.L and HNSS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHLD.L vs. HNSS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHLD.L drawdown since its inception was -36.07%, smaller than the maximum HNSS.L drawdown of -51.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHLD.L and HNSS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHLD.LHNSS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.07%

-51.82%

+15.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.40%

-30.87%

+19.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.72%

-37.48%

+14.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.38%

-12.47%

+8.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.27%

-18.91%

+9.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.27%

11.73%

-6.46%

Volatility

SHLD.L vs. HNSS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Dist (SHLD.L) is 7.42%, while HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF (HNSS.L) has a volatility of 18.25%. This indicates that SHLD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HNSS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHLD.LHNSS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.42%

18.25%

-10.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.10%

32.57%

-14.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.64%

57.52%

-35.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.39%

41.06%

-19.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.23%

41.06%

-19.83%

SHLD.L vs. HNSS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHLD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than HNSS.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHLD.L vs. HNSS.L - Dividend Comparison

SHLD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while HNSS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HNSS.L
HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHLD.L
iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Dist
0.35%0.39%0.48%0.43%0.63%0.66%0.84%1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHLD.L and HNSS.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HNSS.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HNSS.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SHLD.L.

SHLD.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while HNSS.L is Semiconductors. SHLD.L tracks iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Dist, while HNSS.L tracks Nasdaq Global Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SHLD.L and 0.35% for HNSS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHLD.L and HNSS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer