SHEH vs. MLPI
SHEH (Shell plc ADRhedged ETF) and MLPI (NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHEH is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Shell plc - Benchmark Price Return, while MLPI is a MLPs fund actively managed by NEOS. SHEH is passively managed, while MLPI is actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SHEH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for MLPI.
Performance
SHEH vs. MLPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHEH achieves a 12.47% return, which is significantly lower than MLPI's 19.76% return.
SHEH
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -4.67%
- 6M
- 16.82%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 1Y
- 18.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MLPI
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 2.13%
- 6M
- 20.89%
- YTD
- 19.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHEH vs. MLPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SHEH Shell plc ADRhedged ETF | 12.47% | 1.82% |
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF | 19.76% | 0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHEH and MLPI is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHEH vs. MLPI — Risk / Return Rank
SHEH
MLPI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SHEH vs. MLPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shell plc ADRhedged ETF (SHEH) and NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHEH | MLPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.99 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHEH vs. MLPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHEH drawdown since its inception was -17.53%, which is greater than MLPI's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHEH and MLPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHEH | MLPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.53% | -5.38% | -12.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.29% | -2.05% | -11.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -1.58% | -2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.10% | — | — |
Volatility
SHEH vs. MLPI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHEH | MLPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.12% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.39% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.50% | 13.33% | +7.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 13.33% | +7.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 13.33% | +7.16% |
SHEH vs. MLPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHEH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHEH vs. MLPI - Dividend Comparison
SHEH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than MLPI's 7.18% yield.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF | 7.18% |
SHEH Shell plc ADRhedged ETF | 2.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHEH and MLPI have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SHEH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SHEH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MLPI.
MLPI has the higher dividend yield at 7.18%, compared with 2.07% for SHEH.
SHEH is categorized as Energy Equities, while MLPI is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and NEOS. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SHEH and 0.68% for MLPI.
Find the right allocation for SHEH and MLPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer