SHE vs. GRW
SHE (SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. SHE is passively managed, while GRW is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SHE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRW.
Performance
SHE vs. GRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SHE
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 10.08%
- YTD
- 19.56%
- 6M
- 21.08%
- 1Y
- 31.32%
- 3Y*
- 24.28%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.83%
GRW
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHE vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SHE SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF | 0.97% |
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF | 1.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHE and GRW is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.80 |
SHE vs. GRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SHE
GRW
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
SHE
GRW
Financial Services
SHE
GRW
Communication Services
SHE
GRW
Industrials
SHE
GRW
Consumer Cyclical
SHE
GRW
Healthcare
SHE
GRW
Consumer Defensive
SHE
GRW
-
Energy
SHE
GRW
-
Utilities
SHE
GRW
-
Real Estate
SHE
GRW
-
Basic Materials
SHE
GRW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHE vs. GRW — Risk / Return Rank
SHE
GRW
SHE vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF (SHE) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHE | GRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.43 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.43 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.98 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHE | GRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 37.56 | -36.82 |
Drawdowns
SHE vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHE drawdown since its inception was -35.80%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -0.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHE and GRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHE | GRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.80% | -0.13% | -35.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.13% | -0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.30% | -0.04% | -6.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | — | — |
Volatility
SHE vs. GRW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHE | GRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.29% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.94% | 9.26% | +3.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.22% | 9.26% | +7.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 9.26% | +8.78% |
SHE vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHE vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison
SHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHE SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF | 1.06% | 1.18% | 1.14% | 1.37% | 1.54% | 0.99% | 1.24% | 1.91% | 7.39% | 5.37% | 6.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHE and GRW have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SHE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SHE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.
SHE has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SHE and 0.75% for GRW.
Find the right allocation for SHE and GRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer