SHDG vs. CAOS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SHDG (Soundwatch Hedged Equity ETF) and CAOS (Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SHDG returned 12.67%/yr vs 4.26%/yr for CAOS. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SHDG charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CAOS.

Performance

SHDG vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Soundwatch Hedged Equity ETF (SHDG) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHDG achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.82% return.

SHDG

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 1.31%
• YTD: 0.88%
• 6M: 1.06%
• 1Y: 12.30%
• 3Y*: 12.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CAOS

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -0.09%
• YTD: 0.82%
• 6M: 0.69%
• 1Y: 1.88%
• 3Y*: 4.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHDG vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SHDG Soundwatch Hedged Equity ETF	0.88%	11.46%	19.66%	12.65%
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.82%	2.55%	5.33%	7.97%

Correlation

The correlation between SHDG and CAOS is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2023	0.13

The correlation between SHDG and CAOS shifts across timeframes, from -0.35 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SHDG vs. CAOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SHDG	CAOS
Technology	36.2%	33.1%
Financial Services	11.9%	12.4%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.0%
Healthcare	8.4%	9.6%
Industrials	8.1%	8.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	5.4%
Energy	3.5%	4.1%
Utilities	2.3%	2.6%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.0%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.9%

Return for Risk

SHDG vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHDG

SHDG Risk / Return Rank: 44
SHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
SHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
SHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 49
SHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
SHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 43

CAOS

CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 40
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 39
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHDG vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Soundwatch Hedged Equity ETF (SHDG) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SHDG	CAOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	1.24	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	1.98	+0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.26	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	2.49	-0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.92	6.22	+0.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SHDG vs. CAOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the CAOS Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHDG and CAOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SHDG	CAOS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.58	1.24	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.32	1.21	+0.11

Drawdowns

SHDG vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHDG drawdown since its inception was -15.82%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHDG and CAOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHDG	CAOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.82%	-3.60%	-12.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.62%	-0.76%	-5.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.82%	-3.60%	-12.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.75%	-1.07%	+0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.74%	-0.90%	-0.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.78%	0.30%	+1.48%

Volatility

SHDG vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison

Soundwatch Hedged Equity ETF (SHDG) has a higher volatility of 0.48% compared to Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) at 0.26%. This indicates that SHDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SHDG	CAOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.48%	0.26%	+0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.66%	1.03%	+4.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.82%	1.52%	+6.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.99%	4.26%	+6.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.99%	4.26%	+6.73%

SHDG vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHDG has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

SHDG vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

SHDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SHDG Soundwatch Hedged Equity ETF	0.49%	0.49%	0.62%	1.24%	0.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SHDG and CAOS in my portfolio?

SHDG and CAOS have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SHDG or CAOS?

SHDG has higher volatility (0.48%) compared to CAOS (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHDG dropped -15.82% vs CAOS's -3.60%.

Which ETF is better, SHDG or CAOS?

On 3-year performance, SHDG leads with 12.67% vs 4.26% for CAOS. On fees, SHDG is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, CAOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SHDG or CAOS?

Over the 3-year period, SHDG has performed better with a 12.67% return vs 4.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SHDG or CAOS?

SHDG is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CAOS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SHDG or CAOS?

SHDG has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.

What is the main difference between SHDG and CAOS?

They also come from different issuers: SoundWatch Capital and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for SHDG and 0.63% for CAOS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SHDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.