SHCDX vs. PYELX
Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus Stone Harbor Emerg Mkts Corp Dbt (SHCDX) and Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX).
SHCDX is managed by Stone Harbor. It was launched on May 31, 2011. PYELX is managed by Paydenfunds. It was launched on Nov 1, 2011.
Performance
SHCDX vs. PYELX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SHCDX vs. PYELX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHCDX Virtus Stone Harbor Emerg Mkts Corp Dbt | -0.10% | 8.81% | 7.58% | 9.70% | -11.76% | 1.95% | 7.77% | 13.94% | -3.90% | 9.29% |
PYELX Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund | -3.61% | 19.79% | -3.48% | 13.16% | -11.28% | -7.83% | 1.79% | 13.92% | -8.16% | 15.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHCDX achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly higher than PYELX's -3.61% return. Over the past 10 years, SHCDX has outperformed PYELX with an annualized return of 4.59%, while PYELX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.36% annualized return.
SHCDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.90%
- YTD
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- 5.94%
- 3Y*
- 7.92%
- 5Y*
- 3.13%
- 10Y*
- 4.59%
PYELX
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -7.08%
- YTD
- -3.61%
- 6M
- -0.34%
- 1Y
- 11.27%
- 3Y*
- 6.06%
- 5Y*
- 2.07%
- 10Y*
- 2.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SHCDX vs. PYELX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHCDX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than PYELX's 0.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SHCDX vs. PYELX — Risk / Return Rank
SHCDX
PYELX
SHCDX vs. PYELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Stone Harbor Emerg Mkts Corp Dbt (SHCDX) and Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHCDX | PYELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.78 | 0.10 | +1.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.19 | 1.21 | +0.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.76 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 0.22 | +1.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.75 | 3.20 | +4.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHCDX | PYELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | 0.10 | +1.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.04 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | 0.07 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.03 | +1.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between SHCDX and PYELX is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SHCDX vs. PYELX - Dividend Comparison
SHCDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.20%, less than PYELX's 7.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHCDX Virtus Stone Harbor Emerg Mkts Corp Dbt | 6.20% | 6.00% | 6.33% | 5.72% | 5.52% | 4.65% | 5.28% | 4.72% | 6.08% | 4.10% | 5.44% | 5.04% |
PYELX Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund | 7.53% | 7.32% | 7.08% | 5.38% | 5.93% | 5.36% | 4.69% | 5.46% | 6.67% | 6.15% | 5.44% | 5.26% |
Drawdowns
SHCDX vs. PYELX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHCDX drawdown since its inception was -26.24%, smaller than the maximum PYELX drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHCDX and PYELX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHCDX | PYELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.24% | -56.98% | +30.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.63% | -50.21% | +46.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.81% | -51.98% | +30.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.24% | -52.62% | +26.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.90% | -7.22% | +5.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.15% | -16.96% | +13.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | 3.52% | -2.74% |
Volatility
SHCDX vs. PYELX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus Stone Harbor Emerg Mkts Corp Dbt (SHCDX) is 0.92%, while Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX) has a volatility of 3.37%. This indicates that SHCDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SHCDX | PYELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.92% | 3.37% | -2.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.40% | 4.62% | -3.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.28% | 112.02% | -108.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.84% | 50.59% | -46.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.95% | 36.37% | -31.42% |