PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHAPX vs. FKUTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHAPX vs. FKUTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX) and Franklin Utilities Fund (FKUTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHAPX achieves a 3.19% return, which is significantly lower than FKUTX's 8.61% return. Over the past 10 years, SHAPX has outperformed FKUTX with an annualized return of 13.23%, while FKUTX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.65% annualized return.


SHAPX

1D
-1.08%
1M
-2.63%
YTD
3.19%
6M
2.25%
1Y
12.33%
3Y*
16.06%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*
13.23%

FKUTX

1D
0.78%
1M
-0.73%
YTD
8.61%
6M
8.34%
1Y
15.84%
3Y*
16.57%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
9.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHAPX vs. FKUTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHAPX
ClearBridge Appreciation Fund
3.19%14.32%22.37%19.50%-12.56%23.52%14.53%29.84%-2.19%18.31%
FKUTX
Franklin Utilities Fund
8.61%14.59%27.18%-4.91%1.67%18.00%-1.87%27.28%2.54%9.58%

Correlation

The correlation between SHAPX and FKUTX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1990

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between SHAPX and FKUTX has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHAPX vs. FKUTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHAPX
SHAPX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SHAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
SHAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

FKUTX
FKUTX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FKUTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKUTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKUTX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FKUTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKUTX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHAPX vs. FKUTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX) and Franklin Utilities Fund (FKUTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHAPXFKUTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.21

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

2.02

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.82

4.85

+1.97

SHAPX vs. FKUTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHAPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the FKUTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHAPX and FKUTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHAPX vs. FKUTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHAPX drawdown since its inception was -46.19%, which is greater than FKUTX's maximum drawdown of -43.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHAPX and FKUTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHAPXFKUTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.19%

-43.59%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.74%

-8.10%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.15%

-16.35%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.53%

-22.53%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.21%

-36.56%

+4.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.16%

-4.01%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.77%

-7.00%

+2.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

3.37%

-1.40%

Volatility

SHAPX vs. FKUTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX) is 3.93%, while Franklin Utilities Fund (FKUTX) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that SHAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKUTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHAPXFKUTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

5.04%

-1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.60%

11.31%

-2.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.99%

14.07%

-3.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.93%

16.89%

-1.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.74%

18.86%

-2.12%

SHAPX vs. FKUTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHAPX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than FKUTX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHAPX vs. FKUTX - Dividend Comparison

SHAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.64%, more than FKUTX's 7.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKUTX
Franklin Utilities Fund
7.12%7.70%8.66%6.47%3.73%4.96%9.88%4.29%5.83%3.55%2.76%6.14%
SHAPX
ClearBridge Appreciation Fund
13.64%14.08%9.00%4.17%8.85%6.54%4.13%7.09%6.71%5.10%3.29%4.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHAPX and FKUTX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKUTX has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to SHAPX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHAPX dropped -46.19% vs FKUTX's -43.59%.

SHAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHAPX and FKUTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer