FKUTX vs. APGAX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FKUTX (Franklin Utilities Fund) and APGAX (AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - FKUTX is a Utilities Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while APGAX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by AllianceBernstein. Over the past 10 years, FKUTX returned 9.55%/yr vs 16.30%/yr for APGAX. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FKUTX charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for APGAX.

Performance

FKUTX vs. APGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Utilities Fund (FKUTX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKUTX achieves a 7.60% return, which is significantly higher than APGAX's 3.65% return. Over the past 10 years, FKUTX has underperformed APGAX with an annualized return of 9.55%, while APGAX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.30% annualized return.

FKUTX

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -1.65%
• YTD: 7.60%
• 6M: 8.10%
• 1Y: 16.66%
• 3Y*: 15.16%
• 5Y*: 11.46%
• 10Y*: 9.55%

APGAX

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: -0.39%
• YTD: 3.65%
• 6M: 3.53%
• 1Y: 15.21%
• 3Y*: 17.75%
• 5Y*: 10.12%
• 10Y*: 16.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKUTX vs. APGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FKUTX Franklin Utilities Fund	7.60%	14.59%	27.18%	-4.91%	1.67%	18.00%	-1.87%	27.28%	2.54%	9.58%
APGAX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A	3.65%	12.96%	25.09%	34.66%	-28.96%	28.60%	34.05%	33.77%	1.97%	31.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FKUTX and APGAX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 1992	0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between FKUTX and APGAX has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FKUTX vs. APGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKUTX

FKUTX Risk / Return Rank: 23
FKUTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
FKUTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
FKUTX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FKUTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
FKUTX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

APGAX

APGAX Risk / Return Rank: 13
APGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
APGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
APGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
APGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
APGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKUTX vs. APGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Utilities Fund (FKUTX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FKUTX	APGAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	0.96	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	1.40	+0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.18	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.11	0.93	+1.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.09	3.40	+1.69

FKUTX vs. APGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKUTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the APGAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKUTX and APGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FKUTX vs. APGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKUTX drawdown since its inception was -43.59%, smaller than the maximum APGAX drawdown of -67.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKUTX and APGAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FKUTX	APGAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.59%	-67.19%	+23.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.10%	-15.33%	+7.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.35%	-21.63%	+5.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.53%	-34.04%	+11.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.56%	-34.04%	-2.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.90%	-2.45%	-2.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.00%	-19.39%	+12.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.35%	4.20%	-0.85%

Volatility

FKUTX vs. APGAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Utilities Fund (FKUTX) is 5.09%, while AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that FKUTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FKUTX	APGAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.09%	5.42%	-0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.32%	11.83%	-0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.06%	14.97%	-0.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.90%	20.25%	-3.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.85%	19.71%	-0.86%

FKUTX vs. APGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKUTX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than APGAX's 0.84% expense ratio.

Dividends

FKUTX vs. APGAX - Dividend Comparison

FKUTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%, less than APGAX's 10.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
APGAX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A	10.91%	11.31%	7.44%	1.75%	0.97%	8.04%	2.87%	3.66%	9.96%	4.09%	2.74%	9.23%
FKUTX Franklin Utilities Fund	7.19%	7.70%	8.66%	6.47%	3.73%	4.96%	9.88%	4.29%	5.83%	3.55%	2.76%	6.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FKUTX and APGAX in my portfolio?

FKUTX and APGAX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FKUTX or APGAX?

APGAX has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to FKUTX (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKUTX dropped -43.59% vs APGAX's -67.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FKUTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.