SGVT vs. PSILX
SGVT (Schwab Government Money Market ETF) and PSILX (T. Rowe Price Spectrum International Equity Fund) are both funds - SGVT is a Money Market fund actively managed by Charles Schwab, while PSILX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past year, SGVT returned 3.74% vs 27.05% for PSILX. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. SGVT charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for PSILX.
Performance
SGVT vs. PSILX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGVT achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than PSILX's 12.26% return.
SGVT
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 1.68%
- 1Y
- 3.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSILX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 6M
- 14.02%
- 1Y
- 27.05%
- 3Y*
- 16.34%
- 5Y*
- 6.27%
- 10Y*
- 8.88%
SGVT vs. PSILX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF | 1.51% | 2.22% |
PSILX T. Rowe Price Spectrum International Equity Fund | 12.26% | 12.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGVT and PSILX is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGVT vs. PSILX — Risk / Return Rank
SGVT
PSILX
SGVT vs. PSILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) and T. Rowe Price Spectrum International Equity Fund (PSILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGVT | PSILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +16.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +98.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 36.10 | 1.30 | +34.80 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 138.97 | 2.04 | +136.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1,477.41 | 7.72 | +1,469.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGVT vs. PSILX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGVT drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum PSILX drawdown of -61.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGVT and PSILX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGVT | PSILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -61.38% | +61.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.03% | -12.72% | +12.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -1.66% | +1.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -14.05% | +14.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 3.32% | -3.32% |
Volatility
SGVT vs. PSILX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) is 0.07%, while T. Rowe Price Spectrum International Equity Fund (PSILX) has a volatility of 6.70%. This indicates that SGVT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGVT | PSILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.07% | 6.70% | -6.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.13% | 14.03% | -13.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21% | 16.33% | -16.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.21% | 15.94% | -15.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.21% | 16.28% | -16.07% |
SGVT vs. PSILX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGVT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than PSILX's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGVT vs. PSILX - Dividend Comparison
SGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, less than PSILX's 4.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSILX T. Rowe Price Spectrum International Equity Fund | 4.83% | 5.42% | 2.04% | 1.88% | 6.67% | 3.49% | 0.88% | 3.49% | 6.69% | 0.58% | 0.17% | 0.08% |
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF | 3.12% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGVT and PSILX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSILX has higher volatility (6.70%) compared to SGVT (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGVT dropped -0.03% vs PSILX's -61.38%.
SGVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.33 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGVT and PSILX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer