SGVT vs. FTBI
SGVT (Schwab Government Money Market ETF) and FTBI (First Trust Balanced Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SGVT is a Money Market fund actively managed by Charles Schwab, while FTBI is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. SGVT charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for FTBI.
Performance
SGVT vs. FTBI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGVT achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than FTBI's 6.54% return.
SGVT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 1.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTBI
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- 6.54%
- 6M
- 6.80%
- 1Y
- 17.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGVT vs. FTBI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF | 1.41% | 2.22% |
FTBI First Trust Balanced Income ETF | 6.54% | 9.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGVT and FTBI is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGVT vs. FTBI — Risk / Return Rank
SGVT
FTBI
SGVT vs. FTBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) and First Trust Balanced Income ETF (FTBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGVT | FTBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 18.52 | 2.65 | +15.87 |
Drawdowns
SGVT vs. FTBI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGVT drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum FTBI drawdown of -5.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGVT and FTBI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGVT | FTBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -5.34% | +5.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.17% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -0.61% | +0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.17% | — |
Volatility
SGVT vs. FTBI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGVT | FTBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.02% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20% | 7.15% | -6.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.20% | 7.13% | -6.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.20% | 7.13% | -6.93% |
SGVT vs. FTBI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGVT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than FTBI's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGVT vs. FTBI - Dividend Comparison
SGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, less than FTBI's 7.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FTBI First Trust Balanced Income ETF | 7.87% | 4.76% |
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF | 3.12% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGVT and FTBI have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGVT is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGVT is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for FTBI.
FTBI has the higher dividend yield at 7.87%, compared with 3.12% for SGVT.
SGVT is categorized as Money Market, while FTBI is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for SGVT and 0.97% for FTBI.
Find the right allocation for SGVT and FTBI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer