SGVT vs. CRQ.NEO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SGVT (Schwab Government Money Market ETF) and CRQ.NEO (iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SGVT is a Money Market fund actively managed by Charles Schwab, while CRQ.NEO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Canada Index. SGVT is actively managed, while CRQ.NEO is passively managed. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGVT charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for CRQ.NEO.

Performance

SGVT vs. CRQ.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) and iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF (CRQ.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SGVT is traded in USD, while CRQ.NEO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CRQ.NEO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGVT achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than CRQ.NEO's 15.72% return.

SGVT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 1.41%
• 6M: 1.69%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRQ.NEO

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: 2.53%
• YTD: 15.72%
• 6M: 20.71%
• 1Y: 42.03%
• 3Y*: 25.34%
• 5Y*: 14.59%
• 10Y*: 12.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGVT vs. CRQ.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF	1.41%	2.22%
CRQ.NEO iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF	15.72%	21.29%

Correlation

The correlation between SGVT and CRQ.NEO is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025	0.02

Return for Risk

SGVT vs. CRQ.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRQ.NEO

CRQ.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 96
CRQ.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CRQ.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CRQ.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CRQ.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
CRQ.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGVT vs. CRQ.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) and iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF (CRQ.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SGVT	CRQ.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.91	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	18.52	0.47	+18.05

Drawdowns

SGVT vs. CRQ.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGVT drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum CRQ.NEO drawdown of -47.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGVT and CRQ.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SGVT	CRQ.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.03%	-47.39%	+47.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.13%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.70%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.53%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.00%	-9.86%	+9.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.68%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SGVT	CRQ.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.27%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.29%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20%	11.59%	-11.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.20%	16.09%	-15.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.20%	19.79%	-19.59%

SGVT vs. CRQ.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGVT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than CRQ.NEO's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

SGVT vs. CRQ.NEO - Dividend Comparison

SGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than CRQ.NEO's 1.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRQ.NEO iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF	1.87%	2.18%	2.72%	2.97%	2.90%	2.17%	2.98%	2.71%	2.46%	1.91%	1.89%	3.09%
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF	3.12%	1.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SGVT and CRQ.NEO in my portfolio?

SGVT and CRQ.NEO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SGVT or CRQ.NEO?

On fees, SGVT is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SGVT or CRQ.NEO?

SGVT is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for CRQ.NEO.

What is the main difference between SGVT and CRQ.NEO?

SGVT is categorized as Money Market, while CRQ.NEO is Canada Equities. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for SGVT and 0.72% for CRQ.NEO.