SGRW vs. FLQS

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

SGRW (Harbor Active Small Cap Growth ETF) and FLQS (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. SGRW is actively managed, while FLQS is passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

SGRW vs. FLQS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Active Small Cap Growth ETF (SGRW) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SGRW

• 1D: 2.17%
• 1M: 12.76%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLQS

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 7.28%
• YTD: 13.86%
• 6M: 12.84%
• 1Y: 20.45%
• 3Y*: 12.91%
• 5Y*: 6.44%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGRW vs. FLQS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SGRW Harbor Active Small Cap Growth ETF	30.61%
FLQS Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF	10.18%

Correlation

The correlation between SGRW and FLQS is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026	0.69

Return for Risk

SGRW vs. FLQS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGRW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FLQS

FLQS Risk / Return Rank: 46
FLQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
FLQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
FLQS Omega Ratio Rank: 41
FLQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FLQS Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGRW vs. FLQS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Active Small Cap Growth ETF (SGRW) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SGRW	FLQS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.34	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.05	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.24	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.28	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.75	—

Drawdowns

SGRW vs. FLQS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGRW drawdown since its inception was -16.25%, smaller than the maximum FLQS drawdown of -42.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGRW and FLQS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SGRW	FLQS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.25%	-42.16%	+25.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.00%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.12%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.05%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.11%	-7.95%	+3.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.04%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SGRW	FLQS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.64%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.59%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.62%	15.27%	+12.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.62%	19.23%	+8.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.62%	21.63%	+5.99%

Dividends

SGRW vs. FLQS - Dividend Comparison

SGRW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLQS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLQS Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF	1.34%	1.16%	1.29%	1.75%	1.40%	0.95%	1.20%	1.41%	1.27%	1.02%
SGRW Harbor Active Small Cap Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SGRW and FLQS in my portfolio?

SGRW and FLQS have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SGRW or FLQS?

FLQS has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.00% for SGRW.

What is the main difference between SGRW and FLQS?

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Franklin Templeton.