PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGRNX vs. IOLZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGRNX vs. IOLZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Growth Fund (SGRNX) and ICON Equity Fund (IOLZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGRNX achieves a 7.83% return, which is significantly lower than IOLZX's 28.15% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SGRNX having a 15.08% annualized return and IOLZX not far behind at 14.51%.


SGRNX

1D
0.33%
1M
3.79%
YTD
7.83%
6M
5.97%
1Y
19.67%
3Y*
21.25%
5Y*
8.26%
10Y*
15.08%

IOLZX

1D
2.03%
1M
8.48%
YTD
28.15%
6M
30.91%
1Y
50.12%
3Y*
24.88%
5Y*
11.20%
10Y*
14.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGRNX vs. IOLZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SGRNX
Allspring Growth Fund
7.83%15.34%29.43%34.06%-36.92%7.43%49.20%37.61%0.69%35.24%
IOLZX
ICON Equity Fund
28.15%15.81%16.87%12.13%-17.78%26.72%16.00%38.22%-16.69%26.78%

Correlation

The correlation between SGRNX and IOLZX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2004

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between SGRNX and IOLZX has dropped to 0.60 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGRNX vs. IOLZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGRNX
SGRNX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
SGRNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGRNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGRNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
SGRNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGRNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

IOLZX
IOLZX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IOLZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOLZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOLZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
IOLZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOLZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGRNX vs. IOLZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Growth Fund (SGRNX) and ICON Equity Fund (IOLZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SGRNXIOLZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.46

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

3.65

-2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.37

12.92

-9.55

SGRNX vs. IOLZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGRNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the IOLZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGRNX and IOLZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SGRNXIOLZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

2.77

-1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.53

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.65

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.41

+0.01

Drawdowns

SGRNX vs. IOLZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGRNX drawdown since its inception was -52.68%, smaller than the maximum IOLZX drawdown of -56.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGRNX and IOLZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGRNXIOLZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.68%

-56.03%

+3.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.99%

-14.35%

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.66%

-24.71%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.79%

-27.77%

-22.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.79%

-41.04%

-8.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.63%

-12.63%

-3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.07%

4.04%

+2.03%

Volatility

SGRNX vs. IOLZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring Growth Fund (SGRNX) is 4.67%, while ICON Equity Fund (IOLZX) has a volatility of 6.36%. This indicates that SGRNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IOLZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGRNXIOLZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

6.36%

-1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.31%

14.98%

-0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.33%

18.86%

-0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.87%

21.43%

+4.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.49%

22.36%

+2.13%

SGRNX vs. IOLZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGRNX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than IOLZX's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGRNX vs. IOLZX - Dividend Comparison

SGRNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.65%, more than IOLZX's 8.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IOLZX
ICON Equity Fund
8.34%10.69%22.21%4.75%18.57%14.12%0.00%3.46%1.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SGRNX
Allspring Growth Fund
19.65%21.19%21.72%7.14%4.93%16.48%10.02%9.81%19.24%27.01%18.95%13.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGRNX and IOLZX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IOLZX has higher volatility (6.36%) compared to SGRNX (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGRNX dropped -52.68% vs IOLZX's -56.03%.

IOLZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGRNX and IOLZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer