PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGPIX vs. VRTGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGPIX vs. VRTGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Small Cap Growth Fund (SGPIX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGPIX achieves a 14.55% return, which is significantly lower than VRTGX's 16.85% return. Over the past 10 years, SGPIX has underperformed VRTGX with an annualized return of 8.30%, while VRTGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.40% annualized return.


SGPIX

1D
-0.54%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
14.55%
6M
12.59%
1Y
24.33%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
2.45%
10Y*
8.30%

VRTGX

1D
-1.36%
1M
2.41%
YTD
16.85%
6M
13.68%
1Y
37.55%
3Y*
18.22%
5Y*
5.71%
10Y*
11.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGPIX vs. VRTGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SGPIX
ProFunds Small Cap Growth Fund
14.55%3.52%7.53%15.35%-22.72%13.29%17.43%18.95%-5.76%12.73%
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
16.85%12.97%15.26%18.80%-26.30%2.82%34.81%28.84%-9.21%22.27%

Correlation

The correlation between SGPIX and VRTGX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.95

The correlation between SGPIX and VRTGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGPIX vs. VRTGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGPIX
SGPIX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SGPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
SGPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

VRTGX
VRTGX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
VRTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGPIX vs. VRTGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Small Cap Growth Fund (SGPIX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SGPIXVRTGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.29

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

2.55

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.09

9.17

-0.08

SGPIX vs. VRTGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the VRTGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGPIX and VRTGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SGPIXVRTGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.77

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.23

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.47

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.51

-0.17

Drawdowns

SGPIX vs. VRTGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGPIX drawdown since its inception was -58.70%, which is greater than VRTGX's maximum drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGPIX and VRTGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGPIXVRTGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.70%

-41.97%

-16.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.15%

-14.80%

+5.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.72%

-28.54%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.64%

-40.48%

+5.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.14%

-41.97%

-1.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-1.38%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.26%

-10.43%

-0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

4.10%

-1.45%

Volatility

SGPIX vs. VRTGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProFunds Small Cap Growth Fund (SGPIX) is 4.63%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) has a volatility of 6.62%. This indicates that SGPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRTGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGPIXVRTGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

6.62%

-1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.51%

15.82%

-3.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.52%

21.42%

-3.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.61%

24.56%

-2.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.34%

24.51%

-2.17%

SGPIX vs. VRTGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGPIX has a 1.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTGX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGPIX vs. VRTGX - Dividend Comparison

SGPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than VRTGX's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SGPIX
ProFunds Small Cap Growth Fund
0.16%0.18%1.58%0.80%3.80%2.06%0.00%0.00%4.29%0.00%0.00%2.58%
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.61%0.57%0.62%0.85%0.78%0.54%0.53%0.90%0.85%0.75%1.07%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SGPIX and VRTGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VRTGX has higher volatility (6.62%) compared to SGPIX (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGPIX dropped -58.70% vs VRTGX's -41.97%.

VRTGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGPIX and VRTGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer