PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGOV vs. FLDR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGOV vs. FLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SGOV having a 1.61% return and FLDR slightly lower at 1.58%.


SGOV

1D
0.02%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.61%
6M
1.78%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
4.71%
5Y*
3.56%
10Y*

FLDR

1D
0.06%
1M
0.43%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.88%
1Y
4.76%
3Y*
5.36%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGOV vs. FLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
1.61%4.24%5.27%5.12%1.58%0.04%0.04%
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
1.58%5.41%5.71%6.32%-0.33%-0.18%1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between SGOV and FLDR is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2020

0.14

The correlation between SGOV and FLDR shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGOV vs. FLDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGOV
SGOV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

FLDR
FLDR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGOV vs. FLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGOVFLDRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+14.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+265.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

195.55

2.73

+192.83

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

398.20

10.19

+388.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4,461.98

69.63

+4,392.35

SGOV vs. FLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGOV Sharpe Ratio is 20.28, which is higher than the FLDR Sharpe Ratio of 5.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGOV and FLDR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGOV vs. FLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGOV drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum FLDR drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGOV and FLDR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGOVFLDRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-12.23%

+12.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.01%

-0.47%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.01%

-0.76%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.03%

-2.33%

+2.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-0.35%

+0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

0.07%

-0.07%

Volatility

SGOV vs. FLDR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) is 0.05%, while Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) has a volatility of 0.20%. This indicates that SGOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGOVFLDRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.05%

0.20%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.13%

0.59%

-0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20%

0.81%

-0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.24%

1.21%

-0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.24%

5.25%

-5.01%

SGOV vs. FLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGOV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FLDR's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SGOV vs. FLDR - Dividend Comparison

SGOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than FLDR's 4.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
4.42%4.66%5.50%5.28%2.09%0.51%1.22%2.69%1.38%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
3.85%4.10%5.10%4.87%1.45%0.03%0.05%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGOV and FLDR have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLDR has higher volatility (0.20%) compared to SGOV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGOV dropped -0.03% vs FLDR's -12.23%.

On 5-year performance, FLDR leads with 3.70% vs 3.56% for SGOV. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLDR has performed better with a 3.70% return vs 3.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLDR.

FLDR has the higher dividend yield at 4.42%, compared with 3.85% for SGOV.

SGOV is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while FLDR is Corporate Bonds. SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index, while FLDR tracks Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SGOV and 0.15% for FLDR.

SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.28 vs 5.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGOV and FLDR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer