PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGOV vs. ETHA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGOV vs. ETHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) and iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGOV achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly higher than ETHA's -43.96% return.


SGOV

1D
0.02%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.61%
6M
1.78%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
4.71%
5Y*
3.56%
10Y*

ETHA

1D
-1.02%
1M
-27.59%
YTD
-43.96%
6M
-45.98%
1Y
-34.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGOV vs. ETHA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
1.61%4.24%2.21%
ETHA
iShares Ethereum Trust ETF
-43.96%-11.31%-4.89%

Correlation

The correlation between SGOV and ETHA is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGOV vs. ETHA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGOV
SGOV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

ETHA
ETHA Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ETHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHA Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHA Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGOV vs. ETHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) and iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGOVETHADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+20.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+276.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

195.55

0.94

+194.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

398.20

-0.57

+398.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4,461.98

-0.98

+4,462.96

SGOV vs. ETHA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGOV Sharpe Ratio is 20.28, which is higher than the ETHA Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGOV and ETHA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGOV vs. ETHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGOV drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum ETHA drawdown of -67.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGOV and ETHA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGOVETHADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-67.56%

+67.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.01%

-67.56%

+67.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-65.65%

+65.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-33.25%

+33.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

39.22%

-39.22%

Volatility

SGOV vs. ETHA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) is 0.05%, while iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) has a volatility of 17.30%. This indicates that SGOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGOVETHADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.05%

17.30%

-17.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.13%

46.58%

-46.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20%

69.29%

-69.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.24%

72.65%

-72.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.24%

72.65%

-72.41%

SGOV vs. ETHA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGOV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHA's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SGOV vs. ETHA - Dividend Comparison

SGOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, while ETHA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ETHA
iShares Ethereum Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
3.85%4.10%5.10%4.87%1.45%0.03%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGOV and ETHA have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETHA has higher volatility (17.30%) compared to SGOV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGOV dropped -0.03% vs ETHA's -67.56%.

On 1-year performance, SGOV leads with 3.91% vs -34.33% for ETHA. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SGOV has performed better with a 3.91% return vs -34.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ETHA.

SGOV has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 0.00% for ETHA.

SGOV is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while ETHA is Cryptocurrency. SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index, while ETHA tracks CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SGOV and 0.25% for ETHA.

SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.28 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGOV and ETHA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer