SGLP.L vs. ROLG.L
SGLP.L (Invesco Physical Gold A) and ROLG.L (iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD) are both exchange-traded funds - SGLP.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold, while ROLG.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SGLP.L returned 19.70%/yr vs 14.93%/yr for ROLG.L. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGLP.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for ROLG.L.
Performance
SGLP.L vs. ROLG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SGLP.L is traded in GBp, while ROLG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ROLG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGLP.L achieves a 3.24% return, which is significantly lower than ROLG.L's 29.88% return.
SGLP.L
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- YTD
- 3.24%
- 6M
- 4.38%
- 1Y
- 33.15%
- 3Y*
- 27.94%
- 5Y*
- 19.70%
- 10Y*
- 14.29%
ROLG.L
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 29.88%
- 6M
- 29.34%
- 1Y
- 45.86%
- 3Y*
- 15.28%
- 5Y*
- 14.93%
- 10Y*
- —
SGLP.L vs. ROLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGLP.L Invesco Physical Gold A | 3.24% | 53.60% | 28.14% | 7.26% | 11.83% | -2.88% | 19.99% | 14.65% | 8.86% |
ROLG.L iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD | 29.88% | 8.64% | 6.25% | -7.36% | 30.51% | 29.23% | -2.41% | 1.84% | -9.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGLP.L and ROLG.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2018 | 0.33 |
The correlation between SGLP.L and ROLG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.34 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGLP.L vs. ROLG.L — Risk / Return Rank
SGLP.L
ROLG.L
SGLP.L vs. ROLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD (ROLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGLP.L | ROLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.49 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 6.70 | -4.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.03 | 19.05 | -14.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGLP.L | ROLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 2.75 | -1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.22 | 0.84 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.60 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
SGLP.L vs. ROLG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGLP.L drawdown since its inception was -38.83%, which is greater than ROLG.L's maximum drawdown of -22.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLP.L and ROLG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGLP.L | ROLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.83% | -22.66% | -16.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.89% | -6.81% | -11.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.89% | -13.27% | -4.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.89% | -19.85% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.55% | -2.97% | -13.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.37% | -8.98% | -4.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.58% | 2.40% | +4.18% |
Volatility
SGLP.L vs. ROLG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L) is 5.09%, while iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD (ROLG.L) has a volatility of 5.84%. This indicates that SGLP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGLP.L | ROLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.09% | 5.84% | -0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.90% | 13.86% | +6.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.02% | 16.60% | +6.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 17.68% | -1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 16.98% | -1.26% |
SGLP.L vs. ROLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGLP.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ROLG.L's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGLP.L vs. ROLG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SGLP.L nor ROLG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SGLP.L and ROLG.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGLP.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGLP.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for ROLG.L.
SGLP.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while ROLG.L is Commodities. SGLP.L tracks Gold, while ROLG.L tracks Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SGLP.L and 0.28% for ROLG.L.
Find the right allocation for SGLP.L and ROLG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer