SGLN.L vs. VHYL.AS
SGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) and VHYL.AS (Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing) are both exchange-traded funds - SGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while VHYL.AS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SGLN.L returned 13.01%/yr vs 11.03%/yr for VHYL.AS. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGLN.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for VHYL.AS.
Performance
SGLN.L vs. VHYL.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SGLN.L is traded in GBp, while VHYL.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VHYL.AS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGLN.L achieves a -1.83% return, which is significantly lower than VHYL.AS's 12.90% return. Over the past 10 years, SGLN.L has outperformed VHYL.AS with an annualized return of 13.01%, while VHYL.AS has yielded a comparatively lower 11.03% annualized return.
SGLN.L
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- -9.54%
- YTD
- -1.83%
- 6M
- -1.90%
- 1Y
- 24.78%
- 3Y*
- 26.65%
- 5Y*
- 18.64%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
VHYL.AS
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- YTD
- 12.90%
- 6M
- 13.64%
- 1Y
- 28.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.86%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
SGLN.L vs. VHYL.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | -1.83% | 53.66% | 28.20% | 7.24% | 11.84% | -2.82% | 19.93% | 14.63% | 4.36% | 1.68% |
VHYL.AS Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing | 12.90% | 18.41% | 11.47% | 4.89% | 5.34% | 20.27% | -3.63% | 15.94% | -6.08% | 9.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGLN.L and VHYL.AS is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2013 | 0.06 |
The correlation between SGLN.L and VHYL.AS shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGLN.L vs. VHYL.AS — Risk / Return Rank
SGLN.L
VHYL.AS
SGLN.L vs. VHYL.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing (VHYL.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGLN.L | VHYL.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.60 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 4.14 | -3.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.51 | 15.36 | -11.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGLN.L vs. VHYL.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -53.23%, which is greater than VHYL.AS's maximum drawdown of -30.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLN.L and VHYL.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGLN.L | VHYL.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.23% | -30.89% | -22.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.87% | -6.85% | -16.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.87% | -13.94% | -8.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.87% | -13.94% | -8.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.87% | -27.87% | +5.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.64% | 0.00% | -20.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.70% | -7.27% | -17.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.37% | 1.86% | +5.51% |
Volatility
SGLN.L vs. VHYL.AS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) has a higher volatility of 6.68% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing (VHYL.AS) at 2.31%. This indicates that SGLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHYL.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGLN.L | VHYL.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.68% | 2.31% | +4.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.78% | 7.12% | +13.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.82% | 8.90% | +14.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.84% | 11.25% | +10.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 13.43% | +5.41% |
SGLN.L vs. VHYL.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGLN.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than VHYL.AS's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGLN.L vs. VHYL.AS - Dividend Comparison
SGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VHYL.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VHYL.AS Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing | 2.46% | 2.85% | 3.04% | 3.41% | 3.78% | 3.03% | 3.08% | 3.24% | 3.68% | 3.13% | 3.02% | 3.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGLN.L and VHYL.AS have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGLN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for VHYL.AS.
SGLN.L is categorized as Gold, while VHYL.AS is Global Equities. SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price, while VHYL.AS tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SGLN.L and 0.29% for VHYL.AS.
Find the right allocation for SGLN.L and VHYL.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer