VHYL.AS vs. VUSA.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing (VHYL.AS) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.AS).
VHYL.AS and VUSA.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VHYL.AS is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI World High Dividend Yield NR USD. It was launched on May 21, 2013. VUSA.AS is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2012. Both VHYL.AS and VUSA.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VHYL.AS or VUSA.AS.
Key characteristics
| VHYL.AS | VUSA.AS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 11.77% | 18.85% |
| 1Y Return | 12.51% | 21.86% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.77% | 11.58% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.86% | 14.51% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 7.33% | 14.14% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.41 | 2.05 |
| Daily Std Dev | 9.52% | 11.71% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.08% | -33.64% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.54% | -2.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between VHYL.AS and VUSA.AS is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VHYL.AS vs. VUSA.AS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, VHYL.AS achieves a 11.77% return, which is significantly lower than VUSA.AS's 18.85% return. Over the past 10 years, VHYL.AS has underperformed VUSA.AS with an annualized return of 7.33%, while VUSA.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 14.14% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VHYL.AS vs. VUSA.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
VHYL.AS has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VUSA.AS's 0.07% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VHYL.AS vs. VUSA.AS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing (VHYL.AS) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VHYL.AS vs. VUSA.AS - Dividend Comparison
VHYL.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than VUSA.AS's 1.07% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHYL.AS Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing | 2.83% | 3.15% | 3.60% | 2.59% | 2.68% | 2.89% | 3.14% | 2.76% | 2.73% | 2.92% | 2.61% | 1.03% |
VUSA.AS Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 1.07% | 1.26% | 1.45% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.46% | 1.74% | 1.64% | 1.66% | 1.76% | 1.45% | 1.19% |
Drawdowns
VHYL.AS vs. VUSA.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VHYL.AS drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, roughly equal to the maximum VUSA.AS drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHYL.AS and VUSA.AS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VHYL.AS vs. VUSA.AS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing (VHYL.AS) is 3.41%, while Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.AS) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that VHYL.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUSA.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.