SGLN.L vs. TIP5.L
SGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) and TIP5.L (iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - SGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while TIP5.L is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SGLN.L returned 20.12%/yr vs 4.42%/yr for TIP5.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGLN.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TIP5.L.
Performance
SGLN.L vs. TIP5.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SGLN.L is traded in GBp, while TIP5.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TIP5.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGLN.L achieves a 3.89% return, which is significantly higher than TIP5.L's 2.18% return.
SGLN.L
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 3.89%
- 6M
- 5.42%
- 1Y
- 33.75%
- 3Y*
- 28.17%
- 5Y*
- 20.12%
- 10Y*
- 14.27%
TIP5.L
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 5.42%
- 3Y*
- 2.54%
- 5Y*
- 4.42%
- 10Y*
- —
SGLN.L vs. TIP5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 3.89% | 53.66% | 28.20% | 7.24% | 11.84% | -2.57% | 19.62% | 14.63% | 4.36% | -0.97% |
TIP5.L iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.18% | -1.35% | 6.73% | -0.97% | 8.82% | 6.42% | 1.83% | 0.91% | 6.52% | -3.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGLN.L and TIP5.L is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017 | 0.23 |
The correlation between SGLN.L and TIP5.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGLN.L vs. TIP5.L — Risk / Return Rank
SGLN.L
TIP5.L
SGLN.L vs. TIP5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) and iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TIP5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGLN.L | TIP5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.14 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 0.97 | +0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.05 | 2.77 | +2.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGLN.L | TIP5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 0.81 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.23 | 0.53 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.33 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
SGLN.L vs. TIP5.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, which is greater than TIP5.L's maximum drawdown of -16.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLN.L and TIP5.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGLN.L | TIP5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.71% | -16.56% | -25.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.57% | -5.59% | -11.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.57% | -8.61% | -8.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.57% | -16.56% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.01% | -5.15% | -10.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.76% | -6.55% | -8.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.67% | 1.95% | +4.72% |
Volatility
SGLN.L vs. TIP5.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TIP5.L) at 1.70%. This indicates that SGLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIP5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGLN.L | TIP5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 1.70% | +3.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.08% | 5.09% | +14.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.19% | 6.67% | +16.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 8.39% | +7.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 8.74% | +7.04% |
SGLN.L vs. TIP5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGLN.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than TIP5.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SGLN.L vs. TIP5.L - Dividend Comparison
SGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TIP5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TIP5.L iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 5.81% | 5.93% | 6.97% | 5.15% | 0.34% | 0.37% | 3.00% | 3.27% | 2.99% | 1.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGLN.L and TIP5.L have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TIP5.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TIP5.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SGLN.L.
SGLN.L is categorized as Gold, while TIP5.L is Inflation-Protected Bonds. SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price, while TIP5.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SGLN.L and 0.10% for TIP5.L.
Find the right allocation for SGLN.L and TIP5.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer