SGLN.L vs. SGLP.L
SGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) and SGLP.L (Invesco Physical Gold A) are both exchange-traded funds - SGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while SGLP.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SGLN.L returned 14.27%/yr vs 14.26%/yr for SGLP.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.12% expense ratio.
Performance
SGLN.L vs. SGLP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SGLN.L having a 3.89% return and SGLP.L slightly higher at 3.97%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SGLN.L having a 14.27% annualized return and SGLP.L not far behind at 14.26%.
SGLN.L
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 3.89%
- 6M
- 5.42%
- 1Y
- 33.75%
- 3Y*
- 28.17%
- 5Y*
- 20.12%
- 10Y*
- 14.27%
SGLP.L
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 3.97%
- 6M
- 5.45%
- 1Y
- 33.77%
- 3Y*
- 28.15%
- 5Y*
- 19.87%
- 10Y*
- 14.26%
SGLN.L vs. SGLP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 3.89% | 53.66% | 28.20% | 7.24% | 11.84% | -2.57% | 19.62% | 14.63% | 4.36% | 1.68% |
SGLP.L Invesco Physical Gold A | 3.97% | 53.60% | 28.14% | 7.26% | 11.83% | -2.88% | 19.99% | 14.65% | 4.31% | 1.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGLN.L and SGLP.L is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2011 | 0.94 |
The correlation between SGLN.L and SGLP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGLN.L vs. SGLP.L — Risk / Return Rank
SGLN.L
SGLP.L
SGLN.L vs. SGLP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) and Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGLN.L | SGLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.29 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 1.88 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.05 | 5.06 | -0.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGLN.L | SGLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 1.46 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.23 | 1.23 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.53 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
SGLN.L vs. SGLP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, which is greater than SGLP.L's maximum drawdown of -38.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLN.L and SGLP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGLN.L | SGLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.71% | -38.83% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.57% | -17.89% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.57% | -17.89% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.57% | -17.89% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.91% | -22.34% | +0.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.01% | -15.97% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.76% | -13.37% | -1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.67% | 6.65% | +0.02% |
Volatility
SGLN.L vs. SGLP.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) and Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L) have volatilities of 5.08% and 5.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGLN.L | SGLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 5.10% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.08% | 19.90% | +0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.19% | 23.02% | +0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 16.11% | +0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 15.72% | +0.06% |
SGLN.L vs. SGLP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SGLN.L and SGLP.L have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SGLN.L vs. SGLP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SGLN.L nor SGLP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, SGLN.L and SGLP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGLN.L and SGLP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.
SGLN.L is categorized as Gold, while SGLP.L is Precious Metals. SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price, while SGLP.L tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco.
Find the right allocation for SGLN.L and SGLP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer