PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SGLN.L vs. RSBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SGLN.L vs. RSBT

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

SGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) and RSBT (Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while RSBT is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Return Stacked. SGLN.L is passively managed, while RSBT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SGLN.L returned 26.65%/yr vs 1.13%/yr for RSBT. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGLN.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for RSBT.

Performance

SGLN.L vs. RSBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) and Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SGLN.L is traded in GBp, while RSBT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RSBT values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGLN.L achieves a -1.83% return, which is significantly lower than RSBT's 6.96% return.

SGLN.L

1D
2.90%
1M
-9.54%
YTD
-1.83%
6M
-1.90%
1Y
24.78%
3Y*
26.65%
5Y*
18.64%
10Y*
13.01%

RSBT

1D
0.46%
1M
-3.02%
YTD
6.96%
6M
8.01%
1Y
25.05%
3Y*
1.13%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGLN.L vs. RSBT - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023
SGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC		-1.83%53.66%28.20%3.68%
RSBT
Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF		6.96%2.45%-1.20%-16.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SGLN.L and RSBT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2023

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Physical Gold ETC

Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF

Often compared with SGLN.L:
SGLN.L vs. IGLN.LSGLN.L vs. GLDSGLN.L vs. IAUSGLN.L vs. SGLS.LSGLN.L vs. GLDW.LSGLN.L vs. GBSP.LSGLN.L vs. PHGP.L
Often compared with RSBT:
RSBT vs. RSSBRSBT vs. RSSTRSBT vs. DBMFRSBT vs. AHTPXRSBT vs. IRONXRSBT vs. SPYRSBT vs. QIS

Return for Risk

SGLN.L vs. RSBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SGLN.L
SGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
RSBT
RSBT Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
RSBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSBT Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
RSBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSBT Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGLN.L vs. RSBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) and Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

SGLN.LRSBTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.09
1.79

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.48
2.33

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.33

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

4.27

-3.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.51

11.51

-8.00

SGLN.L vs. RSBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGLN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the RSBT Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGLN.L and RSBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGLN.L vs. RSBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -53.23%, which is greater than RSBT's maximum drawdown of -30.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLN.L and RSBT.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SGLN.LRSBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.23%

-30.34%

-22.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.87%

-5.67%

-17.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.87%

-21.81%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.87%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.87%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.64%

-11.96%

-8.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.70%

-17.64%

-7.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.37%

2.11%

+5.26%

Volatility

SGLN.L vs. RSBT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) has a higher volatility of 6.68% compared to Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) at 5.20%. This indicates that SGLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SGLN.LRSBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.68%

5.20%

+1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.78%

10.39%

+10.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.82%

13.53%

+10.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.84%

14.08%

+7.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.84%

14.08%

+4.76%

SGLN.L vs. RSBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGLN.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

SGLN.L vs. RSBT - Dividend Comparison

SGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%.

PositionTTM202520242023
RSBT
Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF		3.01%3.20%0.00%2.38%
SGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

SGLN.L and RSBT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SGLN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for RSBT.

SGLN.L is categorized as Gold, while RSBT is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SGLN.L and 0.97% for RSBT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGLN.L and RSBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer