SGLN.L vs. IBTL.L
SGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) and IBTL.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - SGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while IBTL.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SGLN.L returned 13.01%/yr vs -1.26%/yr for IBTL.L. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGLN.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTL.L.
Performance
SGLN.L vs. IBTL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGLN.L achieves a -1.83% return, which is significantly lower than IBTL.L's -0.34% return. Over the past 10 years, SGLN.L has outperformed IBTL.L with an annualized return of 13.01%, while IBTL.L has yielded a comparatively lower -1.26% annualized return.
SGLN.L
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- -9.54%
- YTD
- -1.83%
- 6M
- -1.90%
- 1Y
- 24.78%
- 3Y*
- 26.65%
- 5Y*
- 18.64%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
IBTL.L
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 0.20%
- 1Y
- 5.42%
- 3Y*
- -3.32%
- 5Y*
- -5.44%
- 10Y*
- -1.26%
SGLN.L vs. IBTL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | -1.83% | 53.66% | 28.20% | 7.24% | 11.84% | -2.82% | 19.93% | 14.63% | 4.36% | 1.68% |
IBTL.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) | -0.34% | -2.80% | -5.51% | -3.61% | -22.17% | -3.32% | 13.06% | 12.05% | 3.88% | -0.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGLN.L and IBTL.L is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2015 | 0.36 |
The correlation between SGLN.L and IBTL.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.36 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGLN.L vs. IBTL.L — Risk / Return Rank
SGLN.L
IBTL.L
SGLN.L vs. IBTL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGLN.L | IBTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.09 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 0.58 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.51 | 1.23 | +2.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGLN.L vs. IBTL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -53.23%, which is greater than IBTL.L's maximum drawdown of -48.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLN.L and IBTL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGLN.L | IBTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.23% | -48.85% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.87% | -8.26% | -14.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.87% | -17.10% | -5.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.87% | -39.34% | +16.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.87% | -48.85% | +25.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.64% | -45.09% | +24.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.70% | -22.69% | -2.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.37% | 3.91% | +3.46% |
Volatility
SGLN.L vs. IBTL.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) has a higher volatility of 6.68% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTL.L) at 2.35%. This indicates that SGLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGLN.L | IBTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.68% | 2.35% | +4.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.78% | 6.40% | +14.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.82% | 9.51% | +14.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.84% | 15.47% | +6.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 16.31% | +2.53% |
SGLN.L vs. IBTL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGLN.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTL.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SGLN.L vs. IBTL.L - Dividend Comparison
SGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBTL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTL.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) | 2.27% | 4.31% | 4.58% | 3.79% | 2.96% | 1.72% | 1.86% | 2.54% | 2.75% | 2.68% | 2.45% | 2.09% |
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGLN.L and IBTL.L have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBTL.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTL.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SGLN.L.
SGLN.L is categorized as Gold, while IBTL.L is Government Bonds. SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price, while IBTL.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SGLN.L and 0.07% for IBTL.L.
Find the right allocation for SGLN.L and IBTL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer