SGLC vs. TOLZ
SGLC (SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF) and TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SGLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Summit Global Investments, while TOLZ is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index. SGLC is actively managed, while TOLZ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SGLC returned 22.49%/yr vs 14.82%/yr for TOLZ. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGLC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for TOLZ.
Performance
SGLC vs. TOLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGLC achieves a 14.85% return, which is significantly higher than TOLZ's 12.63% return.
SGLC
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 5.34%
- YTD
- 14.85%
- 6M
- 16.84%
- 1Y
- 33.91%
- 3Y*
- 22.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOLZ
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- -0.72%
- YTD
- 12.63%
- 6M
- 12.19%
- 1Y
- 16.19%
- 3Y*
- 14.82%
- 5Y*
- 8.71%
- 10Y*
- 7.80%
SGLC vs. TOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SGLC SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF | 14.85% | 17.30% | 20.19% | 18.93% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 12.63% | 14.76% | 11.67% | 3.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGLC and TOLZ is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2023 | 0.35 |
The correlation between SGLC and TOLZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SGLC vs. TOLZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SGLC
TOLZ
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
SGLC
TOLZ
Financial Services
SGLC
TOLZ
Communication Services
SGLC
TOLZ
-
Consumer Cyclical
SGLC
TOLZ
Healthcare
SGLC
TOLZ
-
Industrials
SGLC
TOLZ
Consumer Defensive
SGLC
TOLZ
Basic Materials
SGLC
TOLZ
-
Energy
SGLC
TOLZ
Real Estate
SGLC
TOLZ
Utilities
SGLC
TOLZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGLC vs. TOLZ — Risk / Return Rank
SGLC
TOLZ
SGLC vs. TOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (SGLC) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGLC | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.27 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 3.14 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.67 | 9.48 | +6.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGLC | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 1.58 | +0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.44 | 0.42 | +1.02 |
Drawdowns
SGLC vs. TOLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGLC drawdown since its inception was -20.24%, smaller than the maximum TOLZ drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLC and TOLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGLC | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.24% | -39.33% | +19.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -5.18% | -4.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.24% | -11.94% | -8.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -1.98% | +1.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.45% | -6.63% | +4.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 1.71% | +0.46% |
Volatility
SGLC vs. TOLZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (SGLC) is 3.26%, while ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that SGLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TOLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGLC | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.26% | 3.60% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.04% | 8.21% | +2.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.49% | 10.35% | +3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 13.99% | +2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 16.30% | -0.27% |
SGLC vs. TOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGLC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TOLZ's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGLC vs. TOLZ - Dividend Comparison
SGLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than TOLZ's 3.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGLC SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF | 0.20% | 0.23% | 8.68% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.62% | 3.99% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 3.16% | 2.96% | 3.63% | 3.30% | 2.62% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGLC and TOLZ have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TOLZ has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to SGLC (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGLC dropped -20.24% vs TOLZ's -39.33%.
On 3-year performance, SGLC leads with 22.49% vs 14.82% for TOLZ. On fees, TOLZ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, SGLC has been the lower-risk option at 3.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SGLC has performed better with a 22.49% return vs 14.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TOLZ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SGLC.
TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.62%, compared with 0.20% for SGLC.
SGLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TOLZ is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Summit Global Investments and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for SGLC and 0.46% for TOLZ.
SGLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGLC and TOLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer