PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGLC vs. TOLZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGLC vs. TOLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (SGLC) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGLC achieves a 14.85% return, which is significantly higher than TOLZ's 12.63% return.


SGLC

1D
0.35%
1M
5.34%
YTD
14.85%
6M
16.84%
1Y
33.91%
3Y*
22.49%
5Y*
10Y*

TOLZ

1D
1.19%
1M
-0.72%
YTD
12.63%
6M
12.19%
1Y
16.19%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
7.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGLC vs. TOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SGLC
SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF
14.85%17.30%20.19%18.93%
TOLZ
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF
12.63%14.76%11.67%3.35%

Correlation

The correlation between SGLC and TOLZ is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2023

0.35

The correlation between SGLC and TOLZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SGLC vs. TOLZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SGLC
TOLZ

Technology

32.4%
0.4%

Financial Services

14.9%
2.0%

Communication Services

11.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
0.8%

Healthcare

9.9%

-

Industrials

6.5%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
4.5%

Basic Materials

3.1%

-

Energy

2.9%
35.4%

Real Estate

2.5%
8.0%

Utilities

1.2%
22.2%

Technology

SGLC
32.4%
TOLZ
0.4%

Financial Services

SGLC
14.9%
TOLZ
2.0%

Communication Services

SGLC
11.2%
TOLZ

-

Consumer Cyclical

SGLC
10.1%
TOLZ
0.8%

Healthcare

SGLC
9.9%
TOLZ

-

Industrials

SGLC
6.5%
TOLZ
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

SGLC
5.4%
TOLZ
4.5%

Basic Materials

SGLC
3.1%
TOLZ

-

Energy

SGLC
2.9%
TOLZ
35.4%

Real Estate

SGLC
2.5%
TOLZ
8.0%

Utilities

SGLC
1.2%
TOLZ
22.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGLC vs. TOLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGLC
SGLC Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SGLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGLC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SGLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGLC Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

TOLZ
TOLZ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
TOLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
TOLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGLC vs. TOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (SGLC) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SGLCTOLZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.27

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

3.14

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.67

9.48

+6.19

SGLC vs. TOLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the TOLZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGLC and TOLZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SGLCTOLZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

1.58

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.44

0.42

+1.02

Drawdowns

SGLC vs. TOLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGLC drawdown since its inception was -20.24%, smaller than the maximum TOLZ drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLC and TOLZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGLCTOLZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.24%

-39.33%

+19.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-5.18%

-4.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.24%

-11.94%

-8.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-1.98%

+1.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.45%

-6.63%

+4.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

1.71%

+0.46%

Volatility

SGLC vs. TOLZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (SGLC) is 3.26%, while ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that SGLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TOLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGLCTOLZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

3.60%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

8.21%

+2.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.49%

10.35%

+3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.03%

13.99%

+2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.03%

16.30%

-0.27%

SGLC vs. TOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGLC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TOLZ's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGLC vs. TOLZ - Dividend Comparison

SGLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than TOLZ's 3.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SGLC
SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF
0.20%0.23%8.68%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TOLZ
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF
3.62%3.99%3.53%3.34%3.01%3.28%3.16%2.96%3.63%3.30%2.62%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGLC and TOLZ have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TOLZ has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to SGLC (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGLC dropped -20.24% vs TOLZ's -39.33%.

On 3-year performance, SGLC leads with 22.49% vs 14.82% for TOLZ. On fees, TOLZ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, SGLC has been the lower-risk option at 3.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SGLC has performed better with a 22.49% return vs 14.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TOLZ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SGLC.

TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.62%, compared with 0.20% for SGLC.

SGLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TOLZ is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Summit Global Investments and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for SGLC and 0.46% for TOLZ.

SGLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGLC and TOLZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer