SGLC vs. SCHX
SGLC (SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SGLC is actively managed, while SCHX is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SGLC returned 22.49%/yr vs 22.63%/yr for SCHX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SGLC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
SGLC vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGLC achieves a 14.85% return, which is significantly higher than SCHX's 11.20% return.
SGLC
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 5.34%
- YTD
- 14.85%
- 6M
- 16.84%
- 1Y
- 33.91%
- 3Y*
- 22.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 4.70%
- YTD
- 11.20%
- 6M
- 10.96%
- 1Y
- 27.92%
- 3Y*
- 22.63%
- 5Y*
- 13.39%
- 10Y*
- 15.41%
SGLC vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SGLC SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF | 14.85% | 17.30% | 20.19% | 18.93% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 11.20% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 17.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGLC and SCHX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2023 | 0.93 |
The correlation between SGLC and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
SGLC vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SGLC
SCHX
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
SGLC
SCHX
Financial Services
SGLC
SCHX
Communication Services
SGLC
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
SGLC
SCHX
Healthcare
SGLC
SCHX
Industrials
SGLC
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
SGLC
SCHX
Basic Materials
SGLC
SCHX
Energy
SGLC
SCHX
Real Estate
SGLC
SCHX
Utilities
SGLC
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGLC vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
SGLC
SCHX
SGLC vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (SGLC) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGLC | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.42 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 3.11 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.67 | 14.13 | +1.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGLC | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 2.34 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.44 | 0.85 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
SGLC vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGLC drawdown since its inception was -20.24%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLC and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGLC | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.24% | -34.33% | +14.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -9.02% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.24% | -19.04% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -0.27% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.45% | -3.97% | +1.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 1.98% | +0.19% |
Volatility
SGLC vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (SGLC) has a higher volatility of 3.26% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) at 2.86%. This indicates that SGLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGLC | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.26% | 2.86% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.04% | 9.03% | +2.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.49% | 11.98% | +1.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 17.12% | -1.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 18.14% | -2.11% |
SGLC vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGLC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGLC vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
SGLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than SCHX's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.00% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
SGLC SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF | 0.20% | 0.23% | 8.68% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, SGLC and SCHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SGLC has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to SCHX (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGLC dropped -20.24% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 3-year performance, SCHX leads with 22.63% vs 22.49% for SGLC. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHX has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 22.63% return vs 22.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SGLC.
SCHX has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.20% for SGLC.
They also come from different issuers: Summit Global Investments and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for SGLC and 0.03% for SCHX.
SGLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGLC and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer