SGLC vs. GINX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SGLC (SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF) and GINX (SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SGLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Summit Global Investments, while GINX is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Summit Global Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SGLC returned 34.95% vs 29.62% for GINX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SGLC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for GINX.

Performance

SGLC vs. GINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (SGLC) and SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF (GINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGLC achieves a 14.94% return, which is significantly higher than GINX's 12.34% return.

SGLC

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 6.47%
• YTD: 14.94%
• 6M: 17.05%
• 1Y: 34.95%
• 3Y*: 22.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GINX

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 2.60%
• YTD: 12.34%
• 6M: 16.19%
• 1Y: 29.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGLC vs. GINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SGLC SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF	14.94%	17.30%	10.87%
GINX SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF	12.34%	25.06%	5.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SGLC and GINX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2024	0.69

The correlation between SGLC and GINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

SGLC vs. GINX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SGLC	GINX
Technology	32.4%	10.7%
Financial Services	14.9%	29.3%
Communication Services	11.2%	4.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	4.9%
Healthcare	9.9%	9.9%
Industrials	6.5%	9.4%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	7.9%
Basic Materials	3.1%	4.1%
Energy	2.9%	10.4%
Real Estate	2.5%	1.7%
Utilities	1.2%	7.0%

Return for Risk

SGLC vs. GINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGLC

SGLC Risk / Return Rank: 76
SGLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
SGLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
SGLC Omega Ratio Rank: 76
SGLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
SGLC Martin Ratio Rank: 81

GINX

GINX Risk / Return Rank: 73
GINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
GINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
GINX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
GINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
GINX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGLC vs. GINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (SGLC) and SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF (GINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SGLC	GINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.60	2.52	+0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	3.53	-0.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.45	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.68	3.45	+0.23
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.42	13.18	+3.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SGLC vs. GINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the GINX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGLC and GINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SGLC	GINX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.60	2.52	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.44	1.39	+0.05

Drawdowns

SGLC vs. GINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGLC drawdown since its inception was -20.24%, which is greater than GINX's maximum drawdown of -12.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLC and GINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SGLC	GINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.24%	-12.53%	-7.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.67%	-8.91%	-0.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.46%	-1.81%	-0.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.17%	2.33%	-0.16%

Volatility

SGLC vs. GINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (SGLC) is 3.37%, while SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF (GINX) has a volatility of 3.62%. This indicates that SGLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SGLC	GINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.37%	3.62%	-0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.04%	9.20%	+1.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.49%	11.83%	+1.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.04%	13.84%	+2.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.04%	13.84%	+2.20%

SGLC vs. GINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGLC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than GINX's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

SGLC vs. GINX - Dividend Comparison

SGLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than GINX's 2.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GINX SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF	2.17%	2.81%	2.97%	0.00%
SGLC SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF	0.20%	0.23%	8.68%	1.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SGLC and GINX in my portfolio?

SGLC and GINX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SGLC or GINX?

GINX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to SGLC (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGLC dropped -20.24% vs GINX's -12.53%.

Which ETF is better, SGLC or GINX?

On 1-year performance, SGLC leads with 34.95% vs 29.62% for GINX. On fees, SGLC is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, SGLC has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SGLC or GINX?

Over the 1-year period, SGLC has performed better with a 34.95% return vs 29.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SGLC or GINX?

SGLC is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for GINX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SGLC or GINX?

GINX has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 0.20% for SGLC.

What is the main difference between SGLC and GINX?

SGLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GINX is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for SGLC and 0.98% for GINX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SGLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.