SGJP.L vs. S400.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SGJP.L (iShares MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and S400.L (Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF) are both Japan Equities funds tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, from iShares and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SGJP.L returned 15.15%/yr vs 15.05%/yr for S400.L. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SGJP.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for S400.L.

Performance

SGJP.L vs. S400.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGJP.L) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (S400.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SGJP.L is traded in GBP, while S400.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the S400.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGJP.L achieves a 17.03% return, which is significantly higher than S400.L's 15.40% return.

SGJP.L

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 4.16%
• YTD: 17.03%
• 6M: 16.27%
• 1Y: 35.44%
• 3Y*: 15.15%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

S400.L

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 5.05%
• YTD: 15.40%
• 6M: 14.83%
• 1Y: 31.77%
• 3Y*: 15.05%
• 5Y*: 9.97%
• 10Y*: 9.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGJP.L vs. S400.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SGJP.L iShares MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	17.03%	16.65%	8.33%	13.55%	-7.58%	2.94%
S400.L Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF	15.40%	17.62%	8.31%	13.66%	-5.83%	2.31%

Correlation

The correlation between SGJP.L and S400.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021	0.98

The correlation between SGJP.L and S400.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

SGJP.L vs. S400.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SGJP.L	S400.L
Industrials	25.2%	27.6%
Technology	20.8%	19.6%
Financial Services	19.0%	13.9%
Consumer Cyclical	11.0%	10.9%
Communication Services	8.6%	6.7%
Healthcare	6.8%	6.3%
Basic Materials	3.1%	5.3%
Real Estate	2.5%	2.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	4.6%
Utilities	0.6%	1.5%
Energy	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

SGJP.L vs. S400.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGJP.L

SGJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 59
SGJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
SGJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
SGJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 58
SGJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
SGJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 59

S400.L

S400.L Risk / Return Rank: 57
S400.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
S400.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
S400.L Omega Ratio Rank: 58
S400.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
S400.L Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGJP.L vs. S400.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGJP.L) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (S400.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SGJP.L	S400.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	1.83	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	2.60	+0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.35	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.17	3.03	+0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.33	9.75	+0.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SGJP.L vs. S400.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the S400.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGJP.L and S400.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SGJP.L	S400.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.86	1.83	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.60	+0.03

Drawdowns

SGJP.L vs. S400.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGJP.L drawdown since its inception was -18.79%, smaller than the maximum S400.L drawdown of -24.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGJP.L and S400.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SGJP.L	S400.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.79%	-24.69%	+5.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.77%	-10.45%	-0.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.67%	-12.83%	-1.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.34%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.43%	-0.43%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.13%	-5.13%	-1.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.31%	3.25%	+0.06%

Volatility

SGJP.L vs. S400.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGJP.L) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (S400.L) have volatilities of 4.09% and 3.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SGJP.L	S400.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.09%	3.99%	+0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.78%	14.23%	+0.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.42%	17.33%	+1.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.94%	15.38%	+0.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.94%	15.80%	+0.14%

SGJP.L vs. S400.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGJP.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than S400.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SGJP.L vs. S400.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SGJP.L nor S400.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SGJP.L and S400.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, SGJP.L and S400.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, SGJP.L or S400.L?

On fees, SGJP.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SGJP.L or S400.L?

SGJP.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for S400.L.

What is the main difference between SGJP.L and S400.L?

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SGJP.L and 0.19% for S400.L.