PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGINX vs. PRULX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGINX vs. PRULX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS GNMA Fund (SGINX) and T. Rowe Price U.S. Treasury Long Term Index Fund (PRULX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGINX achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly higher than PRULX's -0.76% return. Over the past 10 years, SGINX has outperformed PRULX with an annualized return of 1.05%, while PRULX has yielded a comparatively lower -0.43% annualized return.


SGINX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
0.21%
6M
0.48%
1Y
5.88%
3Y*
3.86%
5Y*
-0.07%
10Y*
1.05%

PRULX

1D
0.14%
1M
-0.36%
YTD
-0.76%
6M
-0.36%
1Y
4.91%
3Y*
-0.15%
5Y*
-5.43%
10Y*
-0.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGINX vs. PRULX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SGINX
DWS GNMA Fund
0.21%7.88%0.59%4.93%-11.82%-1.12%3.29%6.65%0.42%1.52%
PRULX
T. Rowe Price U.S. Treasury Long Term Index Fund
-0.76%6.69%-5.71%2.90%-30.45%-5.22%18.34%22.58%-1.86%8.23%

Correlation

The correlation between SGINX and PRULX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.70

The correlation between SGINX and PRULX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.83 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGINX vs. PRULX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGINX
SGINX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

PRULX
PRULX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
PRULX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRULX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRULX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
PRULX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRULX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGINX vs. PRULX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS GNMA Fund (SGINX) and T. Rowe Price U.S. Treasury Long Term Index Fund (PRULX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SGINXPRULXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.10

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

0.69

+1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.58

1.83

+4.75

SGINX vs. PRULX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the PRULX Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGINX and PRULX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SGINXPRULXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

0.55

+1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

-0.37

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

-0.03

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.45

+0.31

Drawdowns

SGINX vs. PRULX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGINX drawdown since its inception was -17.37%, smaller than the maximum PRULX drawdown of -47.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGINX and PRULX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGINXPRULXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.37%

-47.40%

+30.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.23%

-7.35%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.51%

-17.64%

+10.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.98%

-42.35%

+25.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.37%

-47.40%

+30.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.86%

-37.12%

+35.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.97%

-9.37%

+7.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

2.72%

-1.74%

Volatility

SGINX vs. PRULX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS GNMA Fund (SGINX) is 1.66%, while T. Rowe Price U.S. Treasury Long Term Index Fund (PRULX) has a volatility of 2.71%. This indicates that SGINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRULX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGINXPRULXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

2.71%

-1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.84%

6.47%

-3.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.85%

9.29%

-5.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.44%

14.66%

-8.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.82%

13.98%

-9.16%

SGINX vs. PRULX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGINX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than PRULX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGINX vs. PRULX - Dividend Comparison

SGINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, less than PRULX's 5.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRULX
T. Rowe Price U.S. Treasury Long Term Index Fund
5.32%5.21%4.88%3.84%2.07%1.72%20.34%16.60%2.62%2.48%4.65%5.09%
SGINX
DWS GNMA Fund
4.47%3.77%3.97%3.82%1.86%1.37%2.22%2.94%2.71%3.07%2.95%3.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGINX and PRULX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRULX has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to SGINX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGINX dropped -17.37% vs PRULX's -47.40%.

SGINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGINX and PRULX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer