SGHT vs. GOLD.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Sight Sciences, Inc. (SGHT) and GoldMining Inc. (GOLD.TO).
Performance
SGHT vs. GOLD.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SGHT vs. GOLD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGHT Sight Sciences, Inc. | -52.46% | 117.86% | -29.46% | -57.74% | -30.51% | -47.55% |
GOLD.TO GoldMining Inc. | -4.72% | 56.73% | 16.56% | 20.20% | 49.07% | 16.47% |
Different Trading Currencies
SGHT is traded in USD, while GOLD.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the GOLD.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
SGHT:
$200.12M
GOLD.TO:
CA$347.35M
SGHT:
-$0.73
GOLD.TO:
-CA$0.07
SGHT:
3.13
GOLD.TO:
1.53
SGHT:
$77.36M
GOLD.TO:
CA$0.00
SGHT:
$66.67M
GOLD.TO:
-CA$328.94K
SGHT:
-$33.70M
GOLD.TO:
-CA$11.20M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGHT achieves a -52.46% return, which is significantly lower than GOLD.TO's -4.72% return.
SGHT
- 1D
- 2.45%
- 1M
- -26.94%
- YTD
- -52.46%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- 1Y
- 57.08%
- 3Y*
- -24.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOLD.TO
- 1D
- 8.61%
- 1M
- -29.78%
- YTD
- -4.72%
- 6M
- -2.23%
- 1Y
- 43.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.15%
- 5Y*
- 27.44%
- 10Y*
- 30.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGHT vs. GOLD.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SGHT
GOLD.TO
SGHT vs. GOLD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sight Sciences, Inc. (SGHT) and GoldMining Inc. (GOLD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGHT | GOLD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.70 | 0.67 | +0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 1.32 | +0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.17 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.78 | 0.92 | -0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.06 | 2.42 | -0.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGHT | GOLD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 0.67 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.41 | 0.23 | -0.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between SGHT and GOLD.TO is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SGHT vs. GOLD.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither SGHT nor GOLD.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGHT Sight Sciences, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GOLD.TO GoldMining Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 34.78% | 30.77% | 42.21% | 51.08% | 11.19% | 9.77% |
Drawdowns
SGHT vs. GOLD.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGHT drawdown since its inception was -96.70%, which is greater than GOLD.TO's maximum drawdown of -82.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGHT and GOLD.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGHT | GOLD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.70% | -76.83% | -19.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.66% | -48.97% | -12.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.36% | -43.15% | -47.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -77.43% | -36.67% | -40.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.26% | 19.09% | +4.17% |
Volatility
SGHT vs. GOLD.TO - Volatility Comparison
Sight Sciences, Inc. (SGHT) has a higher volatility of 37.65% compared to GoldMining Inc. (GOLD.TO) at 20.34%. This indicates that SGHT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOLD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SGHT | GOLD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 37.65% | 20.34% | +17.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 64.69% | 55.61% | +9.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.63% | 64.47% | +18.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 91.79% | 57.14% | +34.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 91.79% | 60.05% | +31.74% |
Financials
SGHT vs. GOLD.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sight Sciences, Inc. and GoldMining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities