SGHC vs. HWM
SGHC (Super Group (SGHC) Limited) and HWM (Howmet Aerospace Inc.) are both stocks. SGHC operates in Gambling (Consumer Cyclical), while HWM operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, SGHC returned 64.45%/yr vs 77.72%/yr for HWM. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SGHC vs. HWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGHC achieves a 12.60% return, which is significantly lower than HWM's 21.74% return.
SGHC
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- -1.51%
- YTD
- 12.60%
- 6M
- 21.22%
- 1Y
- 55.45%
- 3Y*
- 64.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HWM
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 21.74%
- 6M
- 27.16%
- 1Y
- 43.67%
- 3Y*
- 77.72%
- 5Y*
- 48.36%
- 10Y*
- 31.46%
SGHC vs. HWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGHC Super Group (SGHC) Limited | 12.60% | 95.00% | 107.65% | 5.67% | -63.64% |
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 21.74% | 87.95% | 102.71% | 37.84% | 28.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGHC and HWM is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | 0.28 |
The correlation between SGHC and HWM shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SGHC:
$6.60B
HWM:
$100.48B
SGHC:
$0.40
HWM:
$4.31
SGHC:
32.33
HWM:
57.86
SGHC:
1.37
HWM:
0.98
SGHC:
3.07
HWM:
11.70
SGHC:
9.65
HWM:
18.20
SGHC:
$2.15B
HWM:
$8.62B
SGHC:
$617.43M
HWM:
$2.81B
SGHC:
$394.23M
HWM:
$2.66B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGHC vs. HWM — Risk / Return Rank
SGHC
HWM
SGHC vs. HWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGHC | HWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.25 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 2.76 | -1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.40 | 7.93 | -4.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGHC | HWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 1.44 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.21 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
SGHC vs. HWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGHC drawdown since its inception was -76.02%, smaller than the maximum HWM drawdown of -88.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGHC and HWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGHC | HWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.02% | -88.30% | +12.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.67% | -15.89% | -21.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.67% | -19.41% | -18.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.98% | -8.86% | +2.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.78% | -31.02% | -14.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.38% | 5.52% | +10.86% |
Volatility
SGHC vs. HWM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) is 10.20%, while Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) has a volatility of 11.29%. This indicates that SGHC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGHC | HWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.20% | 11.29% | -1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.62% | 23.99% | +6.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.43% | 30.55% | +15.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.59% | 32.02% | +27.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.59% | 39.77% | +19.82% |
Dividends
SGHC vs. HWM - Dividend Comparison
SGHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than HWM's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.31% | 0.25% | 0.13% | 0.05% | 0.39% | 1.42% | 0.88% | 40.49% | 1.22% |
SGHC Super Group (SGHC) Limited | 3.22% | 1.34% | 4.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SGHC vs. HWM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Super Group (SGHC) Limited and Howmet Aerospace Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SGHC vs. HWM - Profitability Comparison
SGHC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Group (SGHC) Limited reported a gross profit of 140.00M and revenue of 578.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.2%.
HWM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a gross profit of 854.00M and revenue of 2.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
SGHC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Group (SGHC) Limited reported an operating income of 100.00M and revenue of 578.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.
HWM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported an operating income of 734.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.7%.
SGHC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Group (SGHC) Limited reported a net income of 67.00M and revenue of 578.00M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
HWM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a net income of 580.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in a net margin of 25.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SGHC and HWM have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HWM has higher volatility (11.29%) compared to SGHC (10.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGHC dropped -76.02% vs HWM's -88.30%.
HWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGHC and HWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer